Today's Articles


Question:

>> the best website to use is expedia.com…the system is reliable and > seems to give accurate info.  But to increase the chance of getting > the best fares go to sidestep,com

But Sidestep won’t can’t do open jaws so it is useless for my travel most of the time. I advocate the use of Orbitz with a check of the winning airlines, sometimes cheaper sometimes not there seems as little reason in this as there is in anything else related to air travel pricing. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Yeah-Orbitz has got some great deals right now. You should definitely at least check it out.  You might be able to get a package deal from them..car + airfare for cheap – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> the best website to use is expedia.com…the system is reliable and >> seems to give accurate info.  But to increase the chance of getting >> the best fares go to sidestep,com > But Sidestep won’t can’t do open jaws so it is useless for my travel most > of the time. I advocate the use of Orbitz with a check of the winning > airlines, sometimes cheaper sometimes not there seems as little reason in > this as there is in anything else related to air travel pricing.

Response:

I have allways used a1travel.com  There site is unavailable or something at the moment, plus I had allways wondered if some other sites where much better though I have allways done OK. I have to fly to Idaho Falls in August and rent a cvar. Thanks

Response:

Hi larry,  y dont u try SmartRover. i found this smart tool on download.com and it is worth using. u have to fill up one form and thats it. the gud thing abt the tool is that u get rid of the monotonous job of filling up forms and regitering on every website u visit for hunting the best deal. it searches across the sites like expedia, travelocity, hotwire, cheaptickets.. and to get the best deal and alerts u when it finds one within ur budget. if u r flwxible in ur travelling dates then thats an added advantage as it can also search for multiple dates. moreover it keeps searching in the background for days and updating u every time it finds a suitable deal.   bon journey nav

Response:

the best website to use is expedia.com…the system is reliable and seems to give accurate info.  But to increase the chance of getting the best fares go to sidestep,com and download their free program.  Sidestep is a comparison shopping engine for travel and usually finds discounted flts that the other systems miss.  Put your info into expedia and sidestep opens and runs a parallel search at the same time.  Sidestep will also give you cheaper alternate airport choices if there are any.  Best combination see my website

Response:

> the best website to use is expedia.com…the system is reliable and seems > to give accurate info.  But to increase the chance of getting the best > fares go to sidestep,com and download their free program.  Sidestep is a > comparison shopping engine for travel and usually finds discounted flts > that the other systems miss.  Put your info into expedia and sidestep > opens and runs a parallel search at the same time.  Sidestep will also > give you cheaper alternate airport choices if there are any.  Best > combination see my website

It doesn’t seem that Sidestep lets you turn off the alternate choices for airports which would be a bad thing, and I can’t seem to get it to pay attention to the times I want to fly. I think both expedia and travelocity give you options to search nearby airports.

Response:

Question:

Hi, A friend and I just booked tickets from SEA – Frankfurt for June. Most tickets to Frankfurt were over $1,000, but we found a roundtrip SEA-LON on Travelocity for $550 on United.  Then we bought a roundtrip LON-FRA on British for $150, costing a total of $700.  In other words, you might consider a roundtrip to London or another city and then buying a cheap ticket from there.  It seems that Germany is fairly expensive for air travel. BTW … I think a good source for cheap tickets is Travelocity, and searching a date range for best fares.  I just checked and right now British Airways is selling the SEA-LHR nonstop flight in October for $575.  Could get cheap tickets to MUC from there … – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently > things look about $800 R/T for each. > Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do > fall fares generally go > on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if > possible (just in case!). Is that wise? > Any advice or comments would be appreciated. > THANK YOU in advance!!!

Response:

Just be careful when packing.  The restriction on the LON-FRA segment will determine what your baggage allowance is.  FFM – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi, > A friend and I just booked tickets from SEA – Frankfurt for June. > Most tickets to Frankfurt were over $1,000, but we found a roundtrip > SEA-LON on Travelocity for $550 on United.  Then we bought a roundtrip > LON-FRA on British for $150, costing a total of $700.  In other words, > you might consider a roundtrip to London or another city and then > buying a cheap ticket from there.  It seems that Germany is fairly > expensive for air travel. > BTW … I think a good source for cheap tickets is Travelocity, and > searching a date range for best fares.  I just checked and right now > British Airways is selling the SEA-LHR nonstop flight in October for > $575.  Could get cheap tickets to MUC from there … >A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently >things look about $800 R/T for each. >Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do >fall fares generally go >on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if >possible (just in case!). Is that wise? >Any advice or comments would be appreciated. >THANK YOU in advance!!!

Response:

I am planning to fly from New York to Vienna, also in October.  I would like to know what "ballpark" fare I might expect to pay. Orbitz has $598 right now for United to/from London and Austrian Airlines from London to Vienna and back. This is for Friday night to Sunday two weeks later. Or if my husband and daughter can fly midweek we can get $578. Is the fare likely to get any lower?  When might it be going down? Any thoughts welcome. Thanks for your help! — Susan Hoffmann

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> consolidator fares are available now in the 600 dollar range with tax and > fees included. > fly midweek if you can > shop at least 3 and better 5 sources > buy when you see a price you want to pay > (before someone else does) > since Europe now has 52 low fare carriers, you could also watch for an > unusually good sale to other airports and take a cheapy flight or rail or > bus to Munich > having said all that, I don’t hold much hope for you to wangle a total trip > price appreciably less than 600 dollars but you have a little time – so shop > and hope > A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently > things look about $800 R/T for each. > Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do > fall fares generally go > on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if > possible (just in case!). Is that wise? > Any advice or comments would be appreciated. > THANK YOU in advance!!!

Response:

> I am planning to fly from New York to Vienna, also in October.  I would > like to know what "ballpark" fare I might expect to pay. Orbitz has $598 > right now for United to/from London and Austrian Airlines from London to > Vienna and back. This is for Friday night to Sunday two weeks later. Or > if my husband and daughter can fly midweek we can get $578. Is the fare > likely to get any lower?  When might it be going down? Any thoughts > welcome. Thanks for your help!

It will definitely be lower at some point between now and then, probably at or below $400 for midweek travel. The question is whether or not you are willing to spend the time keeping up with the fares so you can strike during the possibly brief period when the fare is down there. It can take a lot of effort and unless you enjoy it as a hobby, and don’t mind the gambling aspect, it may not be worthwhile. As an example, I am flying from DC to Amsterdam in a few weeks. The fare was $450 for a long time. Recently it hopped to $550 and hovered around there. I checked several places a few times a day, and last night happened to catch it at $360 and grabbed it. Now I see it’s up to $570. Still $400 from New York. October fares are similar to April, and while Vienna is usually a little more than Amsterdam, there will be a sale at some point where they’re the same price (or very close). miguel — Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/

Response:

Thanks for the advice, Miguel.  I guess we will buy when the Discover balance is likely to be lowest! 8-) — Susan Hoffmann

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am planning to fly from New York to Vienna, also in October.  I would > like to know what "ballpark" fare I might expect to pay. Orbitz has $598 > right now for United to/from London and Austrian Airlines from London to > Vienna and back. This is for Friday night to Sunday two weeks later. Or > if my husband and daughter can fly midweek we can get $578. Is the fare > likely to get any lower?  When might it be going down? Any thoughts > welcome. Thanks for your help! > It will definitely be lower at some point between now and then, probably at > or below $400 for midweek travel. The question is whether or not you are > willing to spend the time keeping up with the fares so you can strike during > the possibly brief period when the fare is down there. > It can take a lot of effort and unless you enjoy it as a hobby, and don’t > mind the gambling aspect, it may not be worthwhile. > As an example, I am flying from DC to Amsterdam in a few weeks. The fare was > $450 for a long time. Recently it hopped to $550 and hovered around there. I > checked several places a few times a day, and last night happened to catch > it at $360 and grabbed it. Now I see it’s up to $570. > Still $400 from New York. > October fares are similar to April, and while Vienna is usually a little > more than Amsterdam, there will be a sale at some point where they’re the > same price (or very close). > miguel > — > Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/

Response:

> I thought I ought to mention, in case it’s relevant, that > Oktoberfest is in September.

Actually, we are going just after it ends, intentionally to miss it! But thanks for your thoughts!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently >things look about $800 R/T for each. >Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do >fall fares generally go >on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if >possible (just in case!). Is that wise? >Any advice or comments would be appreciated. >THANK YOU in advance!!! > I thought I ought to mention, in case it’s relevant, that > Oktoberfest is in September.

But if he goes then, the fares will be even higher… :)

Response:

>A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently >things look about $800 R/T for each. >Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do >fall fares generally go >on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if >possible (just in case!). Is that wise? >Any advice or comments would be appreciated. >THANK YOU in advance!!!

I thought I ought to mention, in case it’s relevant, that Oktoberfest is in September.     *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *     * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Response:

consolidator fares are available now in the 600 dollar range with tax and fees included. fly midweek if you can shop at least 3 and better 5 sources buy when you see a price you want to pay (before someone else does) since Europe now has 52 low fare carriers, you could also watch for an unusually good sale to other airports and take a cheapy flight or rail or bus to Munich having said all that, I don’t hold much hope for you to wangle a total trip price appreciably less than 600 dollars but you have a little time – so shop and hope

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently > things look about $800 R/T for each. > Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do > fall fares generally go > on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if > possible (just in case!). Is that wise? > Any advice or comments would be appreciated. > THANK YOU in advance!!!

Response:

A small group (5) of us want to fly from SEA to MUC in October. Currently things look about $800 R/T for each. Should we book now or wait? If we wait until closer to the date, WHEN do fall fares generally go on sale? Are there any downsides to waiting? I want to avoid US Air if possible (just in case!). Is that wise? Any advice or comments would be appreciated. THANK YOU in advance!!!

Response:

Question:

Hi all I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare through Princess or can we do better on our own? J. Johnston

Response:

> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own?

That depends.. You have already stated the fare was the same as your TA could get out of Denver. You didn’t mention what your TA could get you out of Casper. Other things to consider. Can you TA get you the same cruies/air rate as the online site? 1. Does the cruise air rate include the travel to and from the ship. (usually, it does) 2. In the event of a flight problem, do you plan to buy travel insurance that will get you to the ship? If you book air travel through the cruise line, generally they assist you in the event of a flight problem.

Response:

Unless we can do better at the time of booking we usually reserve the cruise line airfare when we book the cruise.  You are not committed to that until you make your final payment, so between the time we book and the time that the final payment is due if we get a better deal, then we will book it ourselves, and then cancel the air with the cruise line.  Most of the time we do much better on our own, but recently with some of the free or deeply discounted air promotions we have stayed with the cruise line. There are times you will save significantly over what the cruise line charges, and there are other times that you can’t.  Unless you have a better deal now, book with the cruise line and keep checking, cancel the air with them if you need to and get it on your own.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

From my general experience with buying flight tickets, I have always found it cheaper to buy it online than with a local TA.  The only times I bought tickets with local TAs were when I flew out on last minute business trips or something similar. I am going on a Princess cruises in a few weeks and the air ticket quotes with the cruises I got within the past few weeks (with local TAs and other websites ) were significantly more than what I could find online.  So I got them separately, but still online. HTH. –Henry – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

I would check on the "add-on" offered  by Princess Cruises.  Unless it is substantially more than what you can buy directly, there are a number of advantages to buying through Princess, transfers to the ship from the airport being just one (another is if the plane is late, at least Princess will know where you are, so you’ve got less risk of missing the ship). Jeff

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Joyce, Besides the issue of cost, if you book the flights yourself, you will have more control over the timing of arrivals and departures, airline(s), and routing (i.e., number of stops).  Many times these can be very important considerations. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own?

Response:

> Besides the issue of cost, if you book the flights yourself, you will have > more control over the timing of arrivals and departures, airline(s), and > routing (i.e., number of stops).  Many times these can be very important > considerations.

The cruise lines allow you to do what is called an air deviation with a better routing for a $35 or $50 fee. On some itineraries like Alaska this could be cheaper than doing your own airfare. I usually do my own but in some instances the cruise line airfare is cheaper. I found cruise line airfare to be cheaper on quotes for Alaska and I have ended up using the cruise line air, with an air deviation fee for a non stop flight, to be cheaper for cruises out of San Juan than air could book on my own. — Charles

Response:

You should price the airfare on your own and compare it to what Princess is offering.  Usually, you can do better on your own, but if you are on an "open jaw" flight, e.g. starting in Vancouver and ending at Seward or vice versa, you may be better off using the cruise-air package.  As it is, you will have to take a commuter flight from CPR to DEN, SLC or maybe SEA. Being in Casper, you are only a day’s drive from Vancouver as it is, so you may want to see about just doing a one-way air as an air add-on and driving. Tom Smith

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Hi Neighbor I am too planning a cruise on Princess this coming June and also from Casper. As to the website you have mentioned I think you mean buycruises.com. As for them they do not offer airfare out of Casper, but rather the rate they are quoting you is from Denver. Not sure why their website says it is from Casper, but that is not the case. I think we have decided on flying out of Billings with Alaska and their commuter line Horizon. The lowest prices quoted on their site for days we will be traveling is about a $100 per person (that is a $300 saving for us) than through Princess from Denver. I also think that Billings is a much easier airport to travel out of then Denver. Also out of Denver I think Alaska and horizon offer a similar fare to Billings. As for buycruises.com I think they were slightly less than what an agent at Travel Management quoted me. On a similar note a friend recommended cruise.com and it looks like they offer us a better price than the travel agent if we on the Coral Princess, rather than Dawn Princess. Also they have a better price than buycruises.com and are even offering us what looks like a better room (larger). As for the person who says Vancouver is only a day from Casper, I think they are wrong. I would say it is more like 2 days or so from Casper. I would not conseder the option of driving there, but that is just me. Hope this helps M. Graham – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

There are probably many  good reasons to do it on your own, but we like the convenience  when they handle it.  It’s great to be met at a the airport in a strange city and taken to the hotel or pier.  We also had a bad experience in Panama once when we had to leave the ship because of a medical emergency. The cruise line, HAL, made all of the medical arrangements and travel arrangements to get us home.  It was a great comfort. Have a great cruise.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

> You should price the airfare on your own and compare it to what Princess is > offering.  

That’s what I always do. > Usually, you can do better on your own,

I found that to be the case with the exception of LAX to Papeete. The Princess fare (crummy OMNI planes though) beats Tahiti Nui Air, Air France, New Zealand Air and Hawaiian Air by LARGE margins. But for domestic connection to LAX, their prices are outrageous. Their Flights to FLL or MIA are always bad. >  but if you are on an > "open jaw" flight, e.g. starting in Vancouver and ending at Seward or vice > versa, you may be better off using the cruise-air package.  As it is, you > will have to take a commuter flight from CPR to DEN, SLC or maybe SEA.

When I did that, I took a roundtrip to SEA;  one-way to Anchorage (Seward); and bus back to SEA from Vancouver. > Being in Casper, you are only a day’s drive from Vancouver as it is, so you > may want to see about just doing a one-way air as an air add-on and driving. > Tom Smith

That’s one of Top 20 reasons NOT to live in Casper.  :-) <Gloat mode on>   I’ll be doing THREE Princess Cruises within the next three months, possibly a 4th, on the new Saffire if the mini-suite fare comes through as advertized.  :-) — Bob.

Response:

>I am a frequent Alaska traveler and have never seen cheaper cruise booked air, >compared to what I can book myself.  But be certain to add the transfers  $25+ >Vancouver – port and at least $59 Anchorage – Seward, less out of Whittier.

Last time we cruised to Vancouver we decided to save a few bucks and took a city bus from downtown to the airport.  It was $3 can or so, and it took not that much longer than a cab (I think it was about 35 minutes with one bus change near the airport). — Asya Kamsky In our society, you can state your views, but they have to be correct.            —  Ernie Hai, coordinator Singapore Gov’t Internet Project

Response:

Chances are you can do better on your own. We have always done better on our own, but each case is different but majority of the time you can do better on your own. One tip is try to get to the port a day or two before the ship leaves. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi all >I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this >coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through >Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises >dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the >cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local >travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare >through Princess or can we do better on our own? >J. Johnston

Response:

Over 1200 miles from Casper to Vancouver!  I wouldn’t drive it either! Jeff – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->As for the person who says Vancouver is only a day from Casper, I >think they are wrong. I would say it is more like 2 days or so from >Casper. I would not conseder the option of driving there, but that is >just me.

Response:

> You should price the airfare on your own and compare it to what Princess is > offering.  

That’s what I always do. > Usually, you can do better on your own,

I found that to be the case with the exception of LAX to Papeete. The Princess fare (crummy OMNI planes though) beats Tahiti Nui Air, Air France, New Zealand Air and Hawaiian Air by LARGE margins. But for domestic connection to LAX, their prices are outrageous. Their Flights to FLL or MIA are always bad. >  but if you are on an > "open jaw" flight, e.g. starting in Vancouver and ending at Seward or vice > versa, you may be better off using the cruise-air package.  As it is, you > will have to take a commuter flight from CPR to DEN, SLC or maybe SEA.

When I did that, I took a roundtrip to SEA;  one-way to Anchorage (Seward); and bus back to SEA from Vancouver. > Being in Casper, you are only a day’s drive from Vancouver as it is, so you > may want to see about just doing a one-way air as an air add-on and driving. > Tom Smith

That’s one of Top 20 reasons NOT to live in Casper.  :-) <Gloat mode on>   I’ll be doing THREE Princess Cruises within the next three months, possibly a 4th, on the new Saffire if the mini-suite fare comes through as advertized.  :-) — Bob.

Response:

>1. Does the cruise air rate include the travel to and from the ship. >(usually, it does)

Alaska can be the exception to that rule.   Double check.  Many lines on the Northbound/Southbound Glacier routes do charge additional for transfers, even with the line’s air. Slightly OT, but RCI is now offering a choice of either motorcoach or rail transfers from / to Anchorage/Seward.  Rail is an additional add-on $-wise. Regards, Keith

Response:

From my general experience with buying flight tickets, I have always found it cheaper to buy it online than with a local TA.  The only times I bought tickets with local TAs were when I flew out on last minute business trips or something similar. I am going on a Princess cruises in a few weeks and the air ticket quotes with the cruises I got within the past few weeks (with local TAs and other websites ) were significantly more than what I could find online.  So I got them separately, but still online. HTH. –Henry – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

I would check on the "add-on" offered  by Princess Cruises.  Unless it is substantially more than what you can buy directly, there are a number of advantages to buying through Princess, transfers to the ship from the airport being just one (another is if the plane is late, at least Princess will know where you are, so you’ve got less risk of missing the ship). Jeff

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Joyce, Besides the issue of cost, if you book the flights yourself, you will have more control over the timing of arrivals and departures, airline(s), and routing (i.e., number of stops).  Many times these can be very important considerations. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own?

Response:

> Besides the issue of cost, if you book the flights yourself, you will have > more control over the timing of arrivals and departures, airline(s), and > routing (i.e., number of stops).  Many times these can be very important > considerations.

The cruise lines allow you to do what is called an air deviation with a better routing for a $35 or $50 fee. On some itineraries like Alaska this could be cheaper than doing your own airfare. I usually do my own but in some instances the cruise line airfare is cheaper. I found cruise line airfare to be cheaper on quotes for Alaska and I have ended up using the cruise line air, with an air deviation fee for a non stop flight, to be cheaper for cruises out of San Juan than air could book on my own. — Charles

Response:

You should price the airfare on your own and compare it to what Princess is offering.  Usually, you can do better on your own, but if you are on an "open jaw" flight, e.g. starting in Vancouver and ending at Seward or vice versa, you may be better off using the cruise-air package.  As it is, you will have to take a commuter flight from CPR to DEN, SLC or maybe SEA. Being in Casper, you are only a day’s drive from Vancouver as it is, so you may want to see about just doing a one-way air as an air add-on and driving. Tom Smith

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

I am a frequent Alaska traveler and have never seen cheaper cruise booked air, compared to what I can book myself.  But be certain to add the transfers  $25+ Vancouver – port and at least $59 Anchorage – Seward, less out of Whittier. Easy to check yourself,  just go to the "multi city" option on booking sites. Be sure to also check the airlines sites direct as well.  

Response:

Hi Neighbor I am too planning a cruise on Princess this coming June and also from Casper. As to the website you have mentioned I think you mean buycruises.com. As for them they do not offer airfare out of Casper, but rather the rate they are quoting you is from Denver. Not sure why their website says it is from Casper, but that is not the case. I think we have decided on flying out of Billings with Alaska and their commuter line Horizon. The lowest prices quoted on their site for days we will be traveling is about a $100 per person (that is a $300 saving for us) than through Princess from Denver. I also think that Billings is a much easier airport to travel out of then Denver. Also out of Denver I think Alaska and horizon offer a similar fare to Billings. As for buycruises.com I think they were slightly less than what an agent at Travel Management quoted me. On a similar note a friend recommended cruise.com and it looks like they offer us a better price than the travel agent if we on the Coral Princess, rather than Dawn Princess. Also they have a better price than buycruises.com and are even offering us what looks like a better room (larger). As for the person who says Vancouver is only a day from Casper, I think they are wrong. I would say it is more like 2 days or so from Casper. I would not conseder the option of driving there, but that is just me. Hope this helps M. Graham – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

There are probably many  good reasons to do it on your own, but we like the convenience  when they handle it.  It’s great to be met at a the airport in a strange city and taken to the hotel or pier.  We also had a bad experience in Panama once when we had to leave the ship because of a medical emergency. The cruise line, HAL, made all of the medical arrangements and travel arrangements to get us home.  It was a great comfort. Have a great cruise.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Hi all I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare through Princess or can we do better on our own? J. Johnston

Response:

> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own?

That depends.. You have already stated the fare was the same as your TA could get out of Denver. You didn’t mention what your TA could get you out of Casper. Other things to consider. Can you TA get you the same cruies/air rate as the online site? 1. Does the cruise air rate include the travel to and from the ship. (usually, it does) 2. In the event of a flight problem, do you plan to buy travel insurance that will get you to the ship? If you book air travel through the cruise line, generally they assist you in the event of a flight problem.

Response:

Unless we can do better at the time of booking we usually reserve the cruise line airfare when we book the cruise.  You are not committed to that until you make your final payment, so between the time we book and the time that the final payment is due if we get a better deal, then we will book it ourselves, and then cancel the air with the cruise line.  Most of the time we do much better on our own, but recently with some of the free or deeply discounted air promotions we have stayed with the cruise line. There are times you will save significantly over what the cruise line charges, and there are other times that you can’t.  Unless you have a better deal now, book with the cruise line and keep checking, cancel the air with them if you need to and get it on your own.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

>I am a frequent Alaska traveler and have never seen cheaper cruise booked air, >compared to what I can book myself.  But be certain to add the transfers  $25+ >Vancouver – port and at least $59 Anchorage – Seward, less out of Whittier.

Last time we cruised to Vancouver we decided to save a few bucks and took a city bus from downtown to the airport.  It was $3 can or so, and it took not that much longer than a cab (I think it was about 35 minutes with one bus change near the airport). — Asya Kamsky In our society, you can state your views, but they have to be correct.            —  Ernie Hai, coordinator Singapore Gov’t Internet Project

Response:

Chances are you can do better on your own. We have always done better on our own, but each case is different but majority of the time you can do better on your own. One tip is try to get to the port a day or two before the ship leaves. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi all >I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this >coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through >Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises >dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the >cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local >travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare >through Princess or can we do better on our own? >J. Johnston

Response:

Over 1200 miles from Casper to Vancouver!  I wouldn’t drive it either! Jeff – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->As for the person who says Vancouver is only a day from Casper, I >think they are wrong. I would say it is more like 2 days or so from >Casper. I would not conseder the option of driving there, but that is >just me.

Response:

> You should price the airfare on your own and compare it to what Princess is > offering.  

That’s what I always do. > Usually, you can do better on your own,

I found that to be the case with the exception of LAX to Papeete. The Princess fare (crummy OMNI planes though) beats Tahiti Nui Air, Air France, New Zealand Air and Hawaiian Air by LARGE margins. But for domestic connection to LAX, their prices are outrageous. Their Flights to FLL or MIA are always bad. >  but if you are on an > "open jaw" flight, e.g. starting in Vancouver and ending at Seward or vice > versa, you may be better off using the cruise-air package.  As it is, you > will have to take a commuter flight from CPR to DEN, SLC or maybe SEA.

When I did that, I took a roundtrip to SEA;  one-way to Anchorage (Seward); and bus back to SEA from Vancouver. > Being in Casper, you are only a day’s drive from Vancouver as it is, so you > may want to see about just doing a one-way air as an air add-on and driving. > Tom Smith

That’s one of Top 20 reasons NOT to live in Casper.  :-) <Gloat mode on>   I’ll be doing THREE Princess Cruises within the next three months, possibly a 4th, on the new Saffire if the mini-suite fare comes through as advertized.  :-) — Bob.

Response:

>1. Does the cruise air rate include the travel to and from the ship. >(usually, it does)

Alaska can be the exception to that rule.   Double check.  Many lines on the Northbound/Southbound Glacier routes do charge additional for transfers, even with the line’s air. Slightly OT, but RCI is now offering a choice of either motorcoach or rail transfers from / to Anchorage/Seward.  Rail is an additional add-on $-wise. Regards, Keith

Response:

From my general experience with buying flight tickets, I have always found it cheaper to buy it online than with a local TA.  The only times I bought tickets with local TAs were when I flew out on last minute business trips or something similar. I am going on a Princess cruises in a few weeks and the air ticket quotes with the cruises I got within the past few weeks (with local TAs and other websites ) were significantly more than what I could find online.  So I got them separately, but still online. HTH. –Henry – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

I would check on the "add-on" offered  by Princess Cruises.  Unless it is substantially more than what you can buy directly, there are a number of advantages to buying through Princess, transfers to the ship from the airport being just one (another is if the plane is late, at least Princess will know where you are, so you’ve got less risk of missing the ship). Jeff

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Joyce, Besides the issue of cost, if you book the flights yourself, you will have more control over the timing of arrivals and departures, airline(s), and routing (i.e., number of stops).  Many times these can be very important considerations. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own?

Response:

> Besides the issue of cost, if you book the flights yourself, you will have > more control over the timing of arrivals and departures, airline(s), and > routing (i.e., number of stops).  Many times these can be very important > considerations.

The cruise lines allow you to do what is called an air deviation with a better routing for a $35 or $50 fee. On some itineraries like Alaska this could be cheaper than doing your own airfare. I usually do my own but in some instances the cruise line airfare is cheaper. I found cruise line airfare to be cheaper on quotes for Alaska and I have ended up using the cruise line air, with an air deviation fee for a non stop flight, to be cheaper for cruises out of San Juan than air could book on my own. — Charles

Response:

You should price the airfare on your own and compare it to what Princess is offering.  Usually, you can do better on your own, but if you are on an "open jaw" flight, e.g. starting in Vancouver and ending at Seward or vice versa, you may be better off using the cruise-air package.  As it is, you will have to take a commuter flight from CPR to DEN, SLC or maybe SEA. Being in Casper, you are only a day’s drive from Vancouver as it is, so you may want to see about just doing a one-way air as an air add-on and driving. Tom Smith

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

I am a frequent Alaska traveler and have never seen cheaper cruise booked air, compared to what I can book myself.  But be certain to add the transfers  $25+ Vancouver – port and at least $59 Anchorage – Seward, less out of Whittier. Easy to check yourself,  just go to the "multi city" option on booking sites. Be sure to also check the airlines sites direct as well.  

Response:

Hi Neighbor I am too planning a cruise on Princess this coming June and also from Casper. As to the website you have mentioned I think you mean buycruises.com. As for them they do not offer airfare out of Casper, but rather the rate they are quoting you is from Denver. Not sure why their website says it is from Casper, but that is not the case. I think we have decided on flying out of Billings with Alaska and their commuter line Horizon. The lowest prices quoted on their site for days we will be traveling is about a $100 per person (that is a $300 saving for us) than through Princess from Denver. I also think that Billings is a much easier airport to travel out of then Denver. Also out of Denver I think Alaska and horizon offer a similar fare to Billings. As for buycruises.com I think they were slightly less than what an agent at Travel Management quoted me. On a similar note a friend recommended cruise.com and it looks like they offer us a better price than the travel agent if we on the Coral Princess, rather than Dawn Princess. Also they have a better price than buycruises.com and are even offering us what looks like a better room (larger). As for the person who says Vancouver is only a day from Casper, I think they are wrong. I would say it is more like 2 days or so from Casper. I would not conseder the option of driving there, but that is just me. Hope this helps M. Graham – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

There are probably many  good reasons to do it on your own, but we like the convenience  when they handle it.  It’s great to be met at a the airport in a strange city and taken to the hotel or pier.  We also had a bad experience in Panama once when we had to leave the ship because of a medical emergency. The cruise line, HAL, made all of the medical arrangements and travel arrangements to get us home.  It was a great comfort. Have a great cruise.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Hi all I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare through Princess or can we do better on our own? J. Johnston

Response:

> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own?

That depends.. You have already stated the fare was the same as your TA could get out of Denver. You didn’t mention what your TA could get you out of Casper. Other things to consider. Can you TA get you the same cruies/air rate as the online site? 1. Does the cruise air rate include the travel to and from the ship. (usually, it does) 2. In the event of a flight problem, do you plan to buy travel insurance that will get you to the ship? If you book air travel through the cruise line, generally they assist you in the event of a flight problem.

Response:

Unless we can do better at the time of booking we usually reserve the cruise line airfare when we book the cruise.  You are not committed to that until you make your final payment, so between the time we book and the time that the final payment is due if we get a better deal, then we will book it ourselves, and then cancel the air with the cruise line.  Most of the time we do much better on our own, but recently with some of the free or deeply discounted air promotions we have stayed with the cruise line. There are times you will save significantly over what the cruise line charges, and there are other times that you can’t.  Unless you have a better deal now, book with the cruise line and keep checking, cancel the air with them if you need to and get it on your own.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all > I live in Casper, WY and my family is planning a cruise to Alaska this > coming June. Just wondering if we should buy the airfare through > Princess Cruises. A friend came across a website called buying cruises > dot com or something like that and they offer airfare through the > cruise company from Casper that is just as cheap as what our local > travel agent can get us out of Denver. Should we buy the airfare > through Princess or can we do better on our own? > J. Johnston

Response:

Question:

The end of the airlines? You must be joking. The industry would stagger and reform with very few carriers, but we can’t do without air travel any more than we can without cars in this day and age.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> If another plane thing happens, that’s the end of the airlines. > It’ll be their fault for lack of security, as it should be. Period (just in > case you didn’t see the period in front of the preceding sentence). > If another fuck-up happens with the bush admin, it’ll be their fault as > well. Or will it be the CIAs fault?  Or, maybe it will be some other > scapegoat? > Where’s grandma? > If al Queda actually pulled off another suicidal plane bombing, how long > do > you think it would be before everyone climbing on a plane would be free to > pack all the firepower they liked? > The main attack will come in a submarine this time…a suicidal submarine > attack on a major American port.

Response:

> The end of the airlines? You must be joking. > The industry would stagger and reform with very few carriers, but we can’t > do without air travel any more than we can without cars in this day and age.

Very few carriers, and much HIGHER prices . The days of cheap fares are about over. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->If another plane thing happens, that’s the end of the airlines. >It’ll be their fault for lack of security, as it should be. Period (just > in >case you didn’t see the period in front of the preceding sentence). >If another fuck-up happens with the bush admin, it’ll be their fault as >well. Or will it be the CIAs fault?  Or, maybe it will be some other >scapegoat? >Where’s grandma? >>If al Queda actually pulled off another suicidal plane bombing, how long >do >>you think it would be before everyone climbing on a plane would be free > to >>pack all the firepower they liked? >>The main attack will come in a submarine this time…a suicidal > submarine >>attack on a major American port.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I think the general population has become saturated.  Those that > are afraid to fly probably won’t ever fly again.  These Chicken > Little / Boy Who Cried Wolf tactics become ignored after a > sufficient quantity of warnings. > In other news, the TSA has reacted to the increased threat level by > _reducing_ (!) Air Marshal coverage. > http://www.msnbc.com/news/945774.asp?0na=x220H110- > Smells like someone is playing with the threat level for political > purposes.

Yes…Id say it is the top level governent making up more lies… With all the misinformation we have been fed over the last couple of years I dont see how anyone can trust what the government says anymore. Their sources are untrustworthy and even our own government officials will lie to us in order to boost the confidence in the president and the government. After all most of the high level officials lose their jobs with the preaz and they have about as much gain as the prez by staying in office for four more years. After 4 more years of Bush and his criminal administration the USA is gonna be a third world nation.

Response:

>> WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security > has told airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may > attempt new suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months. >That department, along with the TSA and most gubbermint agencies, >are completely clueless.  The only reason they give us these horse-

How paraiod are the dept.of homeland security and what power do they have?  Since ask someone who is coming over from America to UK this month to bring over a DVD with him but was told by homeland security they will take it away cause it is a DVD!.  It seems now it is best if goto america to have nothing, buy clothes and stuff there, and than dump them before leaving again! reverse my email address, and remove the obvious spam traps to reach me by email. http://www.callthrough.tk/ = site not updated.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security > > has told airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may > > attempt new suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months. > That department, along with the TSA and most gubbermint agencies, > are completely clueless.  The only reason they give us these horse- > crap warnings is that they want to be covered in case anything were > to happen, and I mean anything.  If one of their informants tells them > something, they immediately create a world-wide alert, whether the > information is reliable or not.  The other posters are correct: the very > *last* thing the terrorists will do is hijack another plane, because the > passengers will beat the crap out of them.  This is just as stupid as > our illustrious government warning us about attacks on July 4 and > other holidays.  The terrorists attacked on September 11 because > it was an average day.  Their next attack will happen on another > average day, and it won’t involve a hijacked plane. > Let me try to get your meaning here: > Because terrorists used planes last time, next time they’ll use a > boat/car/truck/whatever because everyone’s going to be expecting planes, and > the majority of passengers know kung-fu. So the terrorists have "obviously" > ruled planes out. > You blithely criticise Homeland Security to the wall and then offer this up as > intelligent strategy. > Nex

Not to mention that if Homeland Security does receive intelligence suggesting an impending attack and does not report the info, a firestorm of criticism would occur should another terrorist attack take place.  The media would scream to the heavens: "if Homeland Security had intelligence information about an attack – why didn’t they release it to warn us?"  KM — (-:alohacyberian:-)  At my website there are 3000 live cameras or visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all about Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security >>has told airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may >>attempt new suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months. >That department, along with the TSA and most gubbermint agencies, >are completely clueless.  The only reason they give us these horse- >crap warnings is that they want to be covered in case anything were >to happen, and I mean anything.  If one of their informants tells them >something, they immediately create a world-wide alert, whether the >information is reliable or not.  The other posters are correct: the very >*last* thing the terrorists will do is hijack another plane, because the >passengers will beat the crap out of them.  This is just as stupid as >our illustrious government warning us about attacks on July 4 and >other holidays.  The terrorists attacked on September 11 because >it was an average day.  Their next attack will happen on another >average day, and it won’t involve a hijacked plane. > Let me try to get your meaning here: > Because terrorists used planes last time, next time they’ll use a > boat/car/truck/whatever because everyone’s going to be expecting planes, and > the majority of passengers know kung-fu. So the terrorists have "obviously" > ruled planes out. > You blithely criticise Homeland Security to the wall and then offer this up as > intelligent strategy. > Nex

No more airline flying for me . It’s too much of a hassle anymore.

Response:

If another plane thing happens, that’s the end of the airlines. It’ll be their fault for lack of security, as it should be. Period (just in case you didn’t see the period in front of the preceding sentence). If another fuck-up happens with the bush admin, it’ll be their fault as well. Or will it be the CIAs fault?  Or, maybe it will be some other scapegoat? Where’s grandma?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> If al Queda actually pulled off another suicidal plane bombing, how long do > you think it would be before everyone climbing on a plane would be free to > pack all the firepower they liked? > The main attack will come in a submarine this time…a suicidal submarine > attack on a major American port.

Response:

> Because terrorists used planes last time, next time they’ll use a > boat/car/truck/whatever because everyone’s going to be expecting > planes, and the majority of passengers know kung-fu. So the > terrorists have "obviously" ruled planes out.

I never wrote that passengers knew martial arts.  Did you pay ANY attention to the shoe bomber or the other potential hijackings?  The passengers beat them and subdued them.  Can you read or use a search engine?  I’ll bet the terrorists are smarter than you are, but that isn’t difficult. Casey

Response:

If al Queda actually pulled off another suicidal plane bombing, how long do you think it would be before everyone climbing on a plane would be free to pack all the firepower they liked? The main attack will come in a submarine this time…a suicidal submarine attack on a major American port.

Response:

> If al Queda actually pulled off another suicidal plane bombing, how long do > you think it would be before everyone climbing on a plane would be free to > pack all the firepower they liked? > The main attack will come in a submarine this time…a suicidal submarine > attack on a major American port.

But then everyone will be climbing aboard subs with explosive rubber fins! What Are you thinking? Nex

Response:

> > Because terrorists used planes last time, next time they’ll use a > boat/car/truck/whatever because everyone’s going to be expecting > planes, and the majority of passengers know kung-fu. So the > terrorists have "obviously" ruled planes out. > I never wrote that passengers knew martial arts.  Did you pay > ANY attention to the shoe bomber or the other potential > hijackings?  The passengers beat them and subdued them.  Can > you read or use a search engine?  I’ll bet the terrorists are > smarter than you are, but that isn’t difficult. > Casey

Re-read my response and blush, Case. Can you do that? If not, please disregard. Nex

Response:

> Warning of more al-Qaeda jet attacks > WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security has told airlines and law > enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may attempt new suicide hijackings sometime > during the next few months.

Dont worry, be happy! It was only a few months ago they saaid they had 100% proof of an attack within weeks, needless to say nothing happened. It was less than a year ago they claimed 100% proof of something they called AMD, they even knew exactly the spot of the items, needless to say that there was nothing and the whole story was just a bad joke by some retarded cooks who had nothing better to do. That is why you can relax, lean back and open another can, pshht, ahhhh, the beer is still okay! /Anders — Remove the obvious part before replying by mail please!

Response:

> > WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security > has told airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may > attempt new suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months. > That department, along with the TSA and most gubbermint agencies, > are completely clueless.  The only reason they give us these horse- > crap warnings is that they want to be covered in case anything were > to happen, and I mean anything.  If one of their informants tells them > something, they immediately create a world-wide alert, whether the > information is reliable or not.  The other posters are correct: the very > *last* thing the terrorists will do is hijack another plane, because the > passengers will beat the crap out of them.  This is just as stupid as > our illustrious government warning us about attacks on July 4 and > other holidays.  The terrorists attacked on September 11 because > it was an average day.  Their next attack will happen on another > average day, and it won’t involve a hijacked plane.

Let me try to get your meaning here: Because terrorists used planes last time, next time they’ll use a boat/car/truck/whatever because everyone’s going to be expecting planes, and the majority of passengers know kung-fu. So the terrorists have "obviously" ruled planes out. You blithely criticise Homeland Security to the wall and then offer this up as intelligent strategy. Nex

Response:

> It is very curious that al Qaeda (or any other terrorist org for that > matter) would even consider hijacking any pax jet in the forseeable > future.   > Americans and for that matter, the world are now on alert and I am quite > positive that if such an attempt were made, any and every able-bodied > man (and woman, esp in high heels) pax will fight to the death to > prevent any airliner takeover. Ties, shoes , coffee, etc will be seen as > effective defensive weapons. > As one tv news show audience member said today, "we have nothing to lose > any more by fighting back now". > After 9/11, surely no ‘assurances’ by the hijackers of ‘"no harm will > come to you if you co-operate" will ever be believed again.  

That should cut down on the number of air pax for the next few months. Some will put off flying out of fear, others because they don’t want to endure additional airport security hassles.

Response:

> WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security > has told airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may > attempt new suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months.

That department, along with the TSA and most gubbermint agencies, are completely clueless.  The only reason they give us these horse- crap warnings is that they want to be covered in case anything were to happen, and I mean anything.  If one of their informants tells them something, they immediately create a world-wide alert, whether the information is reliable or not.  The other posters are correct: the very *last* thing the terrorists will do is hijack another plane, because the passengers will beat the crap out of them.  This is just as stupid as our illustrious government warning us about attacks on July 4 and other holidays.  The terrorists attacked on September 11 because it was an average day.  Their next attack will happen on another average day, and it won’t involve a hijacked plane. Casey

Response:

@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net: > I think the general population has become saturated.  Those that > are afraid to fly probably won’t ever fly again.  These Chicken > Little / Boy Who Cried Wolf tactics become ignored after a > sufficient quantity of warnings.

In other news, the TSA has reacted to the increased threat level by _reducing_ (!) Air Marshal coverage. http://www.msnbc.com/news/945774.asp?0na=x220H110- Smells like someone is playing with the threat level for political purposes. — "The broad mass of a nation . . . will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one." — Adolf Hitler |  **REGIME CHANGE 2004** Coridon Henshaw / http://www3.sympatico.ca/gcircle/csbh

Response:

>> WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security has told > airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may attempt new > suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months. > Ah, another terrorism warning.  Shrubby’s poll numbers must have just taken > another hit.  Utterly amazing.

I’m waiting to see what new redder-than-red color they invent for the late-October terror alert. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu

Response:

> That should cut down on the number of air pax for the next few > months. Some will put off flying out of fear, others because they > don’t want to endure additional airport security hassles.

I think the general population has become saturated.  Those that are afraid to fly probably won’t ever fly again.  These Chicken Little / Boy Who Cried Wolf tactics become ignored after a sufficient quantity of warnings. Casey

Response:

> News shows have studio audiences?

Fox does, and I think CNN does, though why bother?

Response:

> WASHINGTON (AP) – The Department of Homeland Security has told > airlines and law enforcement agencies that al-Qaeda may attempt new > suicide hijackings sometime during the next few months.

Ah, another terrorism warning.  Shrubby’s poll numbers must have just taken another hit.  Utterly amazing. — "The broad mass of a nation . . . will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one." — Adolf Hitler |  **REGIME CHANGE 2004** Coridon Henshaw / http://www3.sympatico.ca/gcircle/csbh

Response:

Yet, once again, the government also warns the TSA to NOT pay ANY extra attention to suspicious Arab-looking people, especially young Middle-Eastern men. It would be politically incorrect to annoy them in any manner (if we lose a few more airliners, and a few more thousand people, that’s apparently a small price to pay). Rather, for our heightened security, TSA will continue to give intensive and invasive inspections to middle-age white men, old white women, and young white children. This intensity will actually double if these white people are found to be American citizens, attempting to use airlines in any American city. p.s. Why did you cross-post this message to so many different, and unrelated, newgroups? I thought only inconsiderate jerks did that.

Response:

>>As one tv news show audience member > said today, "we have nothing to lose > any more by fighting back now". >News shows have studio audiences?

This was on "Dayside w/ Linda Vester" on FoxNews. CNN had, until recently, a similar audience participation news discussion show.

Response:

what was that line from Star Wars "KILL THEM ALL-WIPE THEM OUT!!"  (any hijacker will be LUCKY to remain ALIVE – and then only for intelligence purposes)

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> It is very curious that al Qaeda (or any other terrorist org for that > matter) would even consider hijacking any pax jet in the forseeable > future. > Americans and for that matter, the world are now on alert and I am quite > positive that if such an attempt were made, any and every able-bodied > man (and woman, esp in high heels) pax will fight to the death to > prevent any airliner takeover. Ties, shoes , coffee, etc will be seen as > effective defensive weapons. > As one tv news show audience member said today, "we have nothing to lose > any more by fighting back now". > After 9/11, surely no ‘assurances’ by the hijackers of ‘"no harm will > come to you if you co-operate" will ever be believed again.

Response:

It is very curious that al Qaeda (or any other terrorist org for that matter) would even consider hijacking any pax jet in the forseeable future.   Americans and for that matter, the world are now on alert and I am quite positive that if such an attempt were made, any and every able-bodied man (and woman, esp in high heels) pax will fight to the death to prevent any airliner takeover. Ties, shoes , coffee, etc will be seen as effective defensive weapons. As one tv news show audience member said today, "we have nothing to lose any more by fighting back now". After 9/11, surely no ‘assurances’ by the hijackers of ‘"no harm will come to you if you co-operate" will ever be believed again.  

Response:

> As one tv news show audience member said today, "we have nothing to lose > any more by fighting back now".

News shows have studio audiences? > After 9/11, surely no ‘assurances’ by the hijackers of ‘"no harm will > come to you if you co-operate" will ever be believed again.  

Well, there have been hijackings since then. Though not in the US that I’m aware of. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu

Response:

Question:

>> Continental ended up dropping their price to $297 and I bought it on > their web page with no commission and 1,000 bonus miles. >Let’s say you decide to cancel your trip the next day. >Many agents could cancel it and get your money back >Try that with one you bought directly from CO.

All you have to do is call CO and cancel it.  Airlines don’t publicize it, but any air tix you buy online in the US can be cancelled without penalty within 24 hours. TAs used to have a remarkably long time, something like a week, to report sales to the airlines, which meant that if you changed your mind and they hadn’t reported the ticket yet, they could just tear it up and cancel the reservation.  Now that everything’s online, that particular window is a lot narrower. For complex trips, a good TA is worth every penny.  If I were planning a RTW trip I wouldn’t dream of doing it myself.  But for simple trips within the US, it’s extremely unlikely that a TA will find anything you couldn’t have found yourself on Orbitz or Travelocity and Expedia. These days, what with web fares (almost all of which are on Orbitz) and negotiated Fares (often on Expedia and sometimes Travelocity) the online sites are more likely to have fares the TA can’t get. – John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 330 5711 Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >[snip] > My wife and I hire a cleaning lady to come to our house once a week > and do a deep clean.  Yes, we could do it ourselves and save the cost. >  But in terms of time saved, it is worth the money.  I get my clothes > laundered, and I always pay extra to have them fold my shirts instead > of leaving them on hangers.  Is it worth it?  For me, yes.  I found it > was taking me 20 minutes a week to fold my shirts before packing them > for my next trip.  20 minutes > $10 USD.  I’ll spend the money and be > glad for the 20 minutes of my life back. >   This is sorta it.  There are jobs just big enough that you could >do yourself, but it is "worth it" to pay someone else.  Small >jobs, no.  Gonna book a ticket from point A to B on some large >volume, highly competed routes, that you’ve done before, yeah >do it yourself.  Assembling an open jaw itinerary at the last >minute to a place you can barely find on a map?  Might make >good use of a GOOD TA. >[snip] > I notice from time to time in this forum that this person or that will > describe how they have been cheated, crapped-on, or otherwise done in > by an airline, hotel, or some other travel-related service or vendor. > And of course that’s no fun.  But I have also often noticed that these > are the same people who scrounge for the absolute lowest price on > EVERYTHING, regardless of imputed quality, and then complain when it > turns out to be crap.  I mean, if you book travel on the Grace L. > Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Repair Company and stay at the Chalk > Outline Hotel in Hell’s Kitchen, NY and spend less than $20, yes, > you’re probably going to have a rotten time.   >[snip] >   A bit harsh, but I know what you mean.  At some point you have >to ask yourself how an outfit can/would afford to offer such a >"good deal".  The possible answers should be a hint.  I don’t defend >outfits that "oversell" their products.  But there is the concept >of "you get what you pay for" which should be at least a guide. >There is the concept of "value" which is different than either >"cheap" or "top of the line".  It is a balance between quality and >cost.  At some point what you lose isn’t worth the $5 you save. >And equally, at some point, what you gain ain’t worth the $50 it >will cost.  I find it true in Wine, Women, and WN.  There is an >expression that the last 10% takes 90% of the effort.  I find >in cost, the first $5 extra gets you the most increase in quality. >i.e. don’t get the cheapest place, get say the 2nd cheapest place. >They’re charging more for something and you’ll probably want it.

Interesting thread; sort of a Rohrshach of human nature. Since I’m not a frequent or business traveler, and since I definitely do not think it’s "part of the fun" when  planning a trip, as one poster opined, I’m staying with my TA. She’s honest and resourceful. I can call on her for help whether I’m having problems in or out of the country.   Ex: She got me a rock-bottom last-minute fare when I had to rush to a funeral.  At that time, I had plenty on my mind except trolling the ‘Net for affordable flights! Basically, it’s a personality thing, as well as a cost-benefit ratio thing.    Some people need to "win" even if it only gains them a few bucks.  Some people prefer to spend the few bucks and devote their time to other pursuits. There’s no value judgment here; whatever blows your horn. — Traveler

Response:

> That was ONE of Bill’s many points about himself, but obviously > not quite true for himself either. among other things, had he spent > only half of his rec.travel.air posting time on arranging trips, > he probably could have arranged all of his own trips, and also > probably could have done a better job than his TA.  :)

Ah, but I cannot control WHEN I will be given an assignment by my boss.  If it was always Tuesday at tea time, then no problem, I can budget time for setting up travel.  But it comes in dribs and drabs – one week I get an assignment to book several week’s travel, another time I get a call at 3:30 on a Friday afternoon to be somewhere the following Monday – which means leaving on Sunday, of course.  If I’m at a customer site – there will be no taking time to pick through web-based travel (and no posting to r.t.a. at that moment either).  A quick phone call or e-mail to my TA and I can get on with the work at hand without worries.  She’ll sort it out quick enough. Best Regards, Bill Mattocks

Response:

snip > agent back to make changes or additions.  Several of us got > together and went to have a meeting with the travel director > locally to discuss this change.  The very first question was "why?". > Why had they prevented us from contacting particular agents.   > The answer, given with a straight face, was because for example, > of the 6 they had locally, "3 of them were getting the vast majority > of the calls".  No one was surprised and they asked him if it occurred > to him why that was.  He answered that he had no clue.  (Sorta > a prophetic answer).  When it was explained to him that it was > because the other 3 were incompetent, his reply was "well, I > can’t do anything about that".

The correct response was "Then perhaps we need to see about doing something about you." FFM

Response:

> >How hard is that?  Of course, our TA knows me, and knows what I like >and dislike.  She’s great. > Are you able to use her for personal trips (or if you become no longer > associated with the company)?  Sounds like you have a really good travel > agent, much better than some of the travel agent stories that I’ve heard > (e.g. travel agent did not inform the customer of an airline schedule > change that resulted in the customer missing the flight).

Yes, she is allowed (and does) assist my wife and I with personal trips.  Obviously, her ‘real job’ with my company takes precedence, but if she has the time, she is allowed to help me with personal travel, and she does. In addition, she has been kind enough to hook me up with special deals that only TA’s get, such as ‘free rental car days’ that I can use for the obvious purpose.  I also get coupons from the rental car companies, but they are often impossible to use, due to restrictions laid on them by the rental agencies.  Hers are ‘trump’ cards. My wife and I went to NYC recently to attend the retirement ceremony of her uncle, who is a ‘heavy hitter’ in NYC.  We flew on FF miles from HP (and they upgraded us to FC on the way out, despite the ‘no upgrade’ policy for economy FF tickets).  Couldn’t get it on the way back, though. My TA gave me 3 ‘free day’ coupons for Hertz, we stayed at my brother-in-law’s house in Stony Brook, NY. We ended up paying for food and my tux rental while we where there – very little else! We met a few people while we were there… http://www.growlery.com/waldorf/Bill_and_Ed_Koch.jpg It is good to have a dedicated travel agent who also happens to be a great person!

Response:

> > I travel extensively for work – over 130 segments last year. We used to use a > travel agent, then went to booking exclusively on-line. I don’t miss the TA at > all. In the cases where I did have a problem, 100% of the time it was the TA’s > fault, and in all of those cases I ended up on the phone to the airline > anyway. We have had no booking problems at all with booking on-line, and on > the rare occasion that we need something a little too complex for the Airline > websites a quick call to the airline has sorted it out. [snip] > I don’t dispute your conclusion that you find a web-based service > better for your needs, but in my case, my experience was the exact > opposite! > Anybody else?

[snip]    We’ve got "Navigant" and mine sits squarely between both of you. They long ago got rid of agents you could call individually [1]. So we can’t get the kind of individual service you are experiencing. They have slowly been installing a web based system much like you describe except that it isn’t quite as dictatorial.  It does now limit what hotels you can book, but it does have some ability to allow exceptions to the rules (basically, it warns you that you might not get compensated but books it anyway) Airline tickets are a slightly different story.  It "offers" you the preferred airlines but does show you some other unpreferred options.  The real problem with it is that it is SLOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWW.   It can take upwards of 2 hours to book everything.  And it frequently makes "mistakes".  Flights are "unavailable" which aren’t.   Hotels don’t even exist, until you hit "refresh" on the browser. It booked me two different hotels on the same night, in a city to which I DIDN’T travel, and didn’t book the city I did travel to.  (Even though the printed itinerary showed the correct bookings). So, now what I tend to do is the worst of both worlds.  I check out all my arrangements using the web, but then call the travel service to get a human to actually make the bookings.  Basically this assures me that I’m getting a hotel where I want with the facilities I desire and that I am picking the best and most convienent flights, yet avoids the "glitches" that are associated with the software. [1]  This process was precious.  At one time, you could find out the phone number of each individual travel agent in the service.  There were 6 onsite, and an a large number more at two national call centers.  I had nabbed one from the national center, but there were 3 locally that ALOT of people liked.  You’d get to know their work schedules.  Occasionally you’d get busy signals so you’d just call back later.  They had phone mail and you could often leave simple messages which would handle almost everything.      Then they took it away.  All calls went through an automatic system which distributed the calls nationally to whomever was available next.  There was no way to contact a particular agent directly.  Even once a trip was booked, you couldn’t get that same agent back to make changes or additions.  Several of us got together and went to have a meeting with the travel director locally to discuss this change.  The very first question was "why?". Why had they prevented us from contacting particular agents.   The answer, given with a straight face, was because for example, of the 6 they had locally, "3 of them were getting the vast majority of the calls".  No one was surprised and they asked him if it occurred to him why that was.  He answered that he had no clue.  (Sorta a prophetic answer).  When it was explained to him that it was because the other 3 were incompetent, his reply was "well, I can’t do anything about that".

Response:

> I think that Bill has hit on part of the answer.  

to arrive at his Axiom (which is impossible to argue against): > I think it depends entirely on your circumstances, and you can’t just > issue a blanket statement like "Travel Agents are always great" or > "Travel Agents always suck".

Just to throw in a couple of counterpoints to the discussion, > Some folks travel so  much that they cannot possibly invest the > time necessary to arrange their trips.

That was ONE of Bill’s many points about himself, but obviously not quite true for himself either. among other things, had he spent only half of his rec.travel.air posting time on arranging trips, he probably could have arranged all of his own trips, and also probably could have done a better job than his TA.  :) > TAs are necessary for them.  

Not necessarily. > For others the time spent searching and considering alternatives > is part of the fun of the trip.

Much truth to THAT!  Besides, haven’t you been in situations in which the time spent telling your TA (or assistant or whatever) your "problem", you could have solved the problem yourself already. These and other points discussed in this thread seem to center, correctly, on two main factors:  TIME  and  MONEY. Ah, but those are arbitrary units with very elastic measuring sticks.  That’s why "eggsheads" in .edu, such your math.cl.nh.edu, correctly captures the essence of the problem by a "utility function of money", and a "utility function of time", and other non-monetary units that enter into an informed decision process into comparable units of widgets for the person analyzing his problem.   For the simple idea of what a "utility function" is about, just imagine you draw a graph in which the vertical axis measures your "happiness index" (from 0 to 100, say), and the horizontal axis measures your personal wealth, in units of dollars, say. You’ll quickly realize that NOBODY’s utility function of money is linear.  For almost everyone, it’ll start nearly constant, from 0 to a certain threshold t1, starts increasing at a non-linear rate until some threshold t2, where the function will level off again.  But EVERYONE has a different t1 and t2, which is why different folks express different reasons why they use and don’t use TAs. In other words, $100 have different "utility" and "values" to you and me, compared to that for Bill Gates, I am quite sure. Which is one "egghead" way of expressing your Theorem, resulting from The Bill Mattock’s Axiom: Matthews Theorem: > The answer is that TAs are no longer necessary.  If you can afford the > cost and find a competent one they make it simpler.  Your choice.

Mattocks’ Corollary 1: > Anyway, back on topic – for me, TA’s are invaluable, worth much more > than the few bucks I (or my company or customer, more likely) might > have saved.  

Mattocks’ Corollary 2: > But if you’re a one-time flier who is both able and > willing to search high and low for the best bucket-shop consolidator > ticket possible and pay in S&H green stamps or trade for Beanie Babies > or something, then no, a TA will probably not be of much value to you.

It’s all easily seen or explained by the notion of "utility" of time and money. — Bob. P.S.  My "utility" for a sleep and rest is pretty steep right now.  :^)

Response:

> I can certainly see using a TA for something like a combination > round-the-world cruiseairfare trip of a lifetime. But for normal business > travel I don’t see value for money.

I think I agree with you with one exception; there is ‘business travel’ and there is traveling for business.  Some of us are hard-core road warriors – that’s our entire life.  Sales, professional services, technicians, indie consultants/contractors and your odd lawyer or doctor thrown in.  For us, there may not be "value for money" unless we’re willing to give up an even bigger chunk of our lives to get this done – and many of us don’t get to do this on ‘company time’. Maybe the indies – they have a different point of view – the dollar they save comes out of their own pockets.  I could certainly see the value in doing your own shopping in that case. Best Regards, Bill Mattocks

Response:

>How hard is that?  Of course, our TA knows me, and knows what I like >and dislike.  She’s great.

Are you able to use her for personal trips (or if you become no longer associated with the company)?  Sounds like you have a really good travel agent, much better than some of the travel agent stories that I’ve heard (e.g. travel agent did not inform the customer of an airline schedule change that resulted in the customer missing the flight). — Timothy J. Lee Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome. No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.

Response:

> That’s interesting!  Our company has an in-house American Express > Travel One TA, and we recently were told to start using the Amex > online service as an alternative, in case the TA was overloaded or we > needed something on a weekend or whatever. > Well.  I tend not to like it at all!  In fact, I’ve quit using it > altogether. > . . . > I don’t dispute your conclusion that you find a web-based service > better for your needs, but in my case, my experience was the exact > opposite!

A few months ago we were told to start the Amex Online thing too. I can’t stand it. I agree with your complaints, and it always found me horrible fares (we work from grant funding so the more I spend on airfare the less I have for hotel, equipment, other projects, etc.). But that doesn’t mean web-based ticket systems are worthless in general. It just means the Amex thing ain’t that hot. I have decent luck with some others (principally Travelocity and Orbitz). miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu Latest photos: Maldives, Dubai and Vietnam

Response:

>I think it depends entirely on your circumstances, and you can’t just >issue a blanket statement like "Travel Agents are always great" or >"Travel Agents always suck".

Depends on the TA as well. I once worked for a company which had a small travel department. They even kept a stock of currencies of the places we were likely to go to. There was one particular lady who worked there who had an almost eidetic memory. Having once put a name to a face, it was there forever. Need a business visa for Oman, Libya, Pakistan? Sorted. Need to go to SAH tomorrow, without enough time to apply for a visa? No problem. Then the company was taken over and the travel department was outsourced to a major UK travel company. I recall walking past and hearing the baffled tones of one TA asking another: "Where the hell is Bardufoss anyway?". It became better and safer for us to book our own travel. — Simon Elliott http://www.ctsn.co.uk/

Response:

> I travel extensively for work – over 130 segments last year. We used to use a > travel agent, then went to booking exclusively on-line. I don’t miss the TA at > all. In the cases where I did have a problem, 100% of the time it was the TA’s > fault, and in all of those cases I ended up on the phone to the airline > anyway. We have had no booking problems at all with booking on-line, and on > the rare occasion that we need something a little too complex for the Airline > websites a quick call to the airline has sorted it out.

Kevin: That’s interesting!  Our company has an in-house American Express Travel One TA, and we recently were told to start using the Amex online service as an alternative, in case the TA was overloaded or we needed something on a weekend or whatever. Well.  I tend not to like it at all!  In fact, I’ve quit using it altogether. First – it is SLOOOOW.  Sometimes by the time it has ’searched’ for a flight to meet my needs, it has also timed out and requires me to log in again.  Infuriating! Second – it was programmed to meet my company’s ‘travel requirements’, including our internal policies and so on.  Sounds great, right?  It knows all about what our policies are, so we we can’t accidentally violate them.  Nah. Like any machine, it is too literal.  Told to prefer American over any other airline (because our company gets some small percentage refund by having them as our ‘Officially Preferred’ airline), it will offer me $2,000 American tickets over $500 United tickets, and three connections over one, because our company PREFERS American.  If I decline to take the flight it offers, it will tell me that it is sending e-mail to my boss for approval before it issues the itinerary – and on a weekend, that’s not going to happen, so there goes my emergency flight that I needed that same day. It single-mindedly insists that I take a $49 Best Western over a $79 Marriott Courtyard, even though the Courtyard is closer to the customer, has high-speed internet access (important in my business), and is well within our company’s policy of max $150 per night hotels. It will not let me ‘over ride’ the choices it offers me. It will not even LET me have a hotel room if there are no hotels in the area that are less than $150 per night – which leaves out hotels in San Francisco and Manhattan (well, maybe not nowadays, but back then when I tried it).  In other words – no hotel for you, sucka!  And my company will not reimburse any travel costs for itins NOT made through our travel agent or travel agent web-thing. The last time I tried it – I got a one-way trip on one airline (got the TSA anal probe), got another one-way on another airline back again (got the probe again).  The trip out had two layovers, including one 6 hour layover in DFW, took 18 hours to fly 900 miles.  The trip back only had one layover, but a connection time of 40 minutes in a huge airport.  The rental car was fine, but the hotel was so low-budget that they only took cash and traveler’s checks, no credit cards – and the parking lot outside of my room was full of cops, complete with lights and sirens, at 3 a.m. one night.  I kept all my possessions in my rental car all week instead of leaving them in the room. And the whole thing ended up costing more than a ‘normal’ flight on my favorite airline (United at the time, I was living in DEN) and a stay at the local Marriott.  Stupid, stupid, stupid. I *much* prefer our human TA.  She knows our company policies and enforces ‘em.  But she also knows how to call the reservations desk at a hotel I want and explain our company’s policy and sometimes get ‘em to knock off a few bucks so I can stay – show me the web-based service that does that.  She knows how to sweet-talk HP into matching a WN price on the rare occasion that they are WAY out of line with company policy on pricing of airline tickets.  She gives me freebie stuff from time to time, like free rental car vouchers.  No web-based TA ever did that for me.  She knows that I like 2 to 2 1/2 hour layovers, and that I don’t like flying on RJ’s.  No way to tell our web-based server that.  She would never even try to put me on WN unless there was nothing left…and so on. As for speed – what’s faster than a simple e-mail to my TA saying "Clone last week’s schedule, please."  Done.  If I’m going to a new gig, I can often do it in three lines of e-mail: ABQ-EWR-ABQ 6/22 (late) – 6/28 (early).  Prefer HP. Marriott Courtyard or Marriott.  Smoking King.  Closest to customer X. Hertz with Neverlost.  Midsize, Smoking. How hard is that?  Of course, our TA knows me, and knows what I like and dislike.  She’s great. I am a 21st Century Digital Boy – I *love* technology!  But in the case of travel agents, let me talk to a human! And FYI – I have *never* had to call an airline to straighten anything out on behalf of a TA’s mistake.  In six years of 100K + miles, I’ve had ONE thing go wrong that I could blame on the TA.  No wait – actually two.  One of them was when an itin I had booked was not ‘confirmed’ by the TA, so it expired and I didn’t actually have the flight.  I called the TA’s 24-hour number and they fixed it pronto – even got the original price back.  Granted, it could have been bad, but in this case it was not.  And the other time – the TA had me picking up my rental car in my departure city, not my arrival city. No problem, Hertz fixed it right up in no time. I don’t dispute your conclusion that you find a web-based service better for your needs, but in my case, my experience was the exact opposite! Anybody else? Best Regards, Bill Mattocks

Response:

[snip] > My wife and I hire a cleaning lady to come to our house once a week > and do a deep clean.  Yes, we could do it ourselves and save the cost. >  But in terms of time saved, it is worth the money.  I get my clothes > laundered, and I always pay extra to have them fold my shirts instead > of leaving them on hangers.  Is it worth it?  For me, yes.  I found it > was taking me 20 minutes a week to fold my shirts before packing them > for my next trip.  20 minutes > $10 USD.  I’ll spend the money and be > glad for the 20 minutes of my life back.

   This is sorta it.  There are jobs just big enough that you could do yourself, but it is "worth it" to pay someone else.  Small jobs, no.  Gonna book a ticket from point A to B on some large volume, highly competed routes, that you’ve done before, yeah do it yourself.  Assembling an open jaw itinerary at the last minute to a place you can barely find on a map?  Might make good use of a GOOD TA. [snip] > I notice from time to time in this forum that this person or that will > describe how they have been cheated, crapped-on, or otherwise done in > by an airline, hotel, or some other travel-related service or vendor. > And of course that’s no fun.  But I have also often noticed that these > are the same people who scrounge for the absolute lowest price on > EVERYTHING, regardless of imputed quality, and then complain when it > turns out to be crap.  I mean, if you book travel on the Grace L. > Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Repair Company and stay at the Chalk > Outline Hotel in Hell’s Kitchen, NY and spend less than $20, yes, > you’re probably going to have a rotten time.  

[snip]    A bit harsh, but I know what you mean.  At some point you have to ask yourself how an outfit can/would afford to offer such a "good deal".  The possible answers should be a hint.  I don’t defend outfits that "oversell" their products.  But there is the concept of "you get what you pay for" which should be at least a guide. There is the concept of "value" which is different than either "cheap" or "top of the line".  It is a balance between quality and cost.  At some point what you lose isn’t worth the $5 you save. And equally, at some point, what you gain ain’t worth the $50 it will cost.  I find it true in Wine, Women, and WN.  There is an expression that the last 10% takes 90% of the effort.  I find in cost, the first $5 extra gets you the most increase in quality. i.e. don’t get the cheapest place, get say the 2nd cheapest place. They’re charging more for something and you’ll probably want it.

Response:

I suppose there is also the issue of TAs such as the one mentioned in this group that booked someone on two connecting BA flights and then ticketed them as separate tickets.  Or was it the fault of the secretary who did the communicating? FFM – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I travel extensively for work – over 130 segments last year. We used to use a > travel agent, then went to booking exclusively on-line. I don’t miss the TA at > all. In the cases where I did have a problem, 100% of the time it was the TA’s > fault, and in all of those cases I ended up on the phone to the airline > anyway. We have had no booking problems at all with booking on-line, and on > the rare occasion that we need something a little too complex for the Airline > websites a quick call to the airline has sorted it out. > There may be TA’s out there that will take the time to search out the best > deal, but we found we could always beat ours. And with Airline web sites as > sophisticated as they are now, changing flight times around is just not a > problem anymore. > Kevin Rhodes > Westbrook, Maine – Weary traveling computer system engineer >If you’re doing anything other than a basic return, a travel agent will be >able to advise which would be the most cost-effective route, the most >direct option (combining airlines or not), what options are or are not >possible, and will check all the combinations to find the price and >dates/times that suit you.  Without you having to do anything.  And you >get the benefit of anything else they can tell you.  For $16 difference, >that’s a bargain.

Response:

>These were supposedly consolidator travel agents–two of them >specifically mentioned Latin American expertise–and none of them >could beat the price I could easily find on the Internet. Are travel >agents worth anything for these kind of trips?

  In my experience, for simple trips like yours it’s hard to beat   the Internet.  I find travel agents useful for the more complex   stuff (like RTW trips) and destinations that are not well-served by   US airlines: Africa, Russia, deep Asia, etc.  Typically, published   fares are outrageous, and to get the best deal one has to buy through   an ethnic travel agent (i.e., someone who sends a lot of people to a   particular destination and thus gets good bulk fares from the airlines).   Occasionally, I see good deals even to places like Brazil and Europe   from consolidators and STA Travel-type outfits, with the additional   benefit that their fares are often more flexible than published fares   (e.g., the itinerary on my last STA ticket could be changed for $25).

Response:

OK, I think we need to make a distinction here. IIRC in Bill’s case he has an "in-house" TA. Technically she works for an agency but she is in his office and at his companies beck and call. This is a whole different ball game than a leisure traveller using a TA and getting a $20-30 surcharge for the TA booking the tickets. In my specific case, it could be said that I have an inhouse TA as well – our administrative assistant does all the booking for the three of us who travel. She is darned good at it too! But she is not technically a TA. Just performs the same functions. I can certainly see using a TA for something like a combination round-the-world cruiseairfare trip of a lifetime. But for normal business travel I don’t see value for money. I will admit that not having used a TA since they stopped working on commission, I don’t have recent knowledge of the level of service. It was pretty poor in our case – we booked 150 flights a year or so, which was not enough to mark us out for any special treatment, and the TA had no incentive to work her butt of to get us the best fare – that just cut her own paycheck! Maybe they try harder now, but we were typically saving 25%+ booking tickets ourselves. Kevin Rhodes Westbrook, Maine – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I think it depends entirely on your circumstances, and you can’t just >issue a blanket statement like "Travel Agents are always great" or >"Travel Agents always suck". >For those who travel for a living (like myself), a travel agent is >invaluable.  We don’t have time to search for the best price and book >it ourselves, and in some cases, the tickets are charged directly to >our employer anyway, so we could not book our own travel even if we >wanted to.

Response:

> Interestingly enough, while they may not still be available, > there were tickets from DFW (3 hours drive), San Antonio (1:20) > and IAH(3 hours) for about $200.  Never forget the Sunday > papers, a traditional travel shoppers venue.

I don’t think 6 hours worth of driving would be a good deal to save a little over $100. After all, not only is there travel time, but also car expenses.  Plus, he did mention getting TA info out of the Sunday paper, so I would guess he looked at the fares advertised there.

Response:

I travel extensively for work – over 130 segments last year. We used to use a travel agent, then went to booking exclusively on-line. I don’t miss the TA at all. In the cases where I did have a problem, 100% of the time it was the TA’s fault, and in all of those cases I ended up on the phone to the airline anyway. We have had no booking problems at all with booking on-line, and on the rare occasion that we need something a little too complex for the Airline websites a quick call to the airline has sorted it out. There may be TA’s out there that will take the time to search out the best deal, but we found we could always beat ours. And with Airline web sites as sophisticated as they are now, changing flight times around is just not a problem anymore. Kevin Rhodes Westbrook, Maine – Weary traveling computer system engineer – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->If you’re doing anything other than a basic return, a travel agent will be >able to advise which would be the most cost-effective route, the most >direct option (combining airlines or not), what options are or are not >possible, and will check all the combinations to find the price and >dates/times that suit you.  Without you having to do anything.  And you >get the benefit of anything else they can tell you.  For $16 difference, >that’s a bargain.

Response:

I think that Bill has hit on part of the answer.  Some folks travel so much that they cannot possibly invest the time necessary to arrange their trips.  TAs are necessary for them.  For others the time spent searching and considering alternatives is part of the fun of the trip. No Ta will invest that much work for a reasonable fee.  Many TAs now refuse to consider independent air travel.  If you don’t want a cruise or package they are not interested.  Too much time.  I suppose the answer depends on how much time you have, how much experience, and how much money.  Bill is on the road constantly and the customers are willing to pay the fees.  I have the time and the costs come from my cash.  Different folks and different solutions. The answer is that TAs are no longer necessary.  If you can afford the cost and find a competent one they make it simpler.  Your choice. FFM – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I think it depends entirely on your circumstances, and you can’t just > issue a blanket statement like "Travel Agents are always great" or > "Travel Agents always suck". > For those who travel for a living (like myself), a travel agent is > invaluable.  We don’t have time to search for the best price and book > it ourselves, and in some cases, the tickets are charged directly to > our employer anyway, so we could not book our own travel even if we > wanted to. > Do Travel Agents save money?  For me, you bet!  In several ways: > * Although there are sometimes web-based prices that are cheaper, I’ve > found my TA is often quite good at finding little deals I didn’t know > about, or creatively putting together bits and pieces of different > tickets to get me where I want to go and when. > * My TA knows about all of my preferences, so I don’t have to paw > through loads of web responses to a web-based search for the one or > two flights that fit my needs.  I don’t know of a web-based search > engine that will let me specify that I *always* want a 2 hour layover, > and I don’t like flying on RJ’s, or that I only want Hertz rental cars > with Neverlost, or that I prefer Marriott-family hotels, *and* I’m a > smoker, AND I have dozens if not hundreds of airline, hotel, and > rental car loyalty program numbers that all need to be plugged in, and > so on, and so on.  She knows it, she juggles it, I don’t have to worry > about it. > * My TA sometimes shoots me little deals.  I mention that my wife and > I are taking a few day’s vacation, and she hooks me up with some free > rental car coupons she happens to have laying around (assuming that > she *does* have them laying around).  Nothing like your TA putting a > couple hundred dollars back in your wallet to make you appreciate her > even more. > * I can shoot an e-mail to my TA and say "Clone my last trip, but this > time give me a hotel closer to the employer" and that’s literally all > I have to do.  She presents me with options (usually two or three, > tops) and I tell her which one to book.  End of problem for me, she is > the one working her tail off. > * Ever try to get out of a ‘non-refundable’ ticket?  My TA has saved > my bacon at least a couple of times when a customer cancelled on me > and I was already comitted to an expensive ticket.  Experienced TA’s > have ‘pals’ inside the industry who can sometimes do favors.  Not > always, but sometimes. > * My TA has on occasion called up an airline that I wanted to fly on > and talked them into matching a price on a cheaper airline going the > same place that I didn’t want to fly on.  I suppose I could do it, but > who has the time?  And I’m not the world’s greatest negotiator. > * My TA has a database of reports that customers have made about > certain hotels – she has warned me off of hotels that seemed great on > paper (close to the customer, good price, name-brand hotel chain), but > have lousy management, so the place is not clean, or in a high-crime > area (yes, really) or has junkies prowling the parking lots at night, > etc (also happened to me once).  Tell me which web-based service can > tell you that a certain hotel is right next to a Greyhound Bus > terminal that is open until 3 a.m. or that a nearby factory belches > noxious fumes at 5 in the morning and your hotel is downwind.  I’ve > been saved from all those and more by my TA, who has lots of data and > often knows the score. > My wife and I hire a cleaning lady to come to our house once a week > and do a deep clean.  Yes, we could do it ourselves and save the cost. >  But in terms of time saved, it is worth the money.  I get my clothes > laundered, and I always pay extra to have them fold my shirts instead > of leaving them on hangers.  Is it worth it?  For me, yes.  I found it > was taking me 20 minutes a week to fold my shirts before packing them > for my next trip.  20 minutes > $10 USD.  I’ll spend the money and be > glad for the 20 minutes of my life back. > I guess what I’m trying to say is that in general, if your goal is to > find the absolute best price without regard for the time you spend > looking for it, you’ll probably be disappointed in the services of a > TA.  Also, my TA has told me that there are some web-only fares that > are NOT AVAILABLE to TA’s – it is a case of the airline trying to do > independent Travel Agents in. > However, if your time is worth more to you than the couple of bucks > you might save scrounging on your own, then a TA is often well worth > it.  A good TA is worth his or her weight in gold, and I treasure the > one I’ve got now – although actually, ALL the TA’s that my company has > used have been terrific over the years.  Just my experience, your > milage may vary. > One thing that I have to toss in – only because your post got me > thinking about it, not aimed at you, so don’t take it personally! > I notice from time to time in this forum that this person or that will > describe how they have been cheated, crapped-on, or otherwise done in > by an airline, hotel, or some other travel-related service or vendor. > And of course that’s no fun.  But I have also often noticed that these > are the same people who scrounge for the absolute lowest price on > EVERYTHING, regardless of imputed quality, and then complain when it > turns out to be crap.  I mean, if you book travel on the Grace L. > Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Repair Company and stay at the Chalk > Outline Hotel in Hell’s Kitchen, NY and spend less than $20, yes, > you’re probably going to have a rotten time.  I know that sometimes > budgets are tight, but dang – travel is voluntary.  Spend cheap, get > cheap.  Name of the game. > Anyway, back on topic – for me, TA’s are invaluable, worth much more > than the few bucks I (or my company or customer, more likely) might > have saved.  But if you’re a one-time flier who is both able and > willing to search high and low for the best bucket-shop consolidator > ticket possible and pay in S&H green stamps or trade for Beanie Babies > or something, then no, a TA will probably not be of much value to you. > Best Regards, > Bill Mattocks

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hello, > Last week I was looking at plane tickets from Austin, Texas > to Mexico City for the first week of August. I had been > checking prices on the Internet (Orbitz & Expedia) and I > thought I would be smart and call some of the travel agents > listed in the Sunday travel section of the paper to see if > they could beat the $330 price I found on several Internet > sites. > I asked four travel agents for a quote for the same dates > and to pick the cheapest airline. Here were my results: > (1) $346 (2) $516 (3) $366 (4) $385 > These were supposedly consolidator travel agents–two of > them specifically mentioned Latin American expertise–and > none of them could beat the price I could easily find on the > Internet. Are travel agents worth anything for these kind of > trips? > Continental ended up dropping their price to $297 and I > bought it on their web page with no commission and 1,000 > bonus miles. > Cheers, > Ben

Interestingly enough, while they may not still be available, there were tickets from DFW (3 hours drive), San Antonio (1:20) and IAH(3 hours) for about $200.  Never forget the Sunday papers, a traditional travel shoppers venue. Alternate departure points area necessity when you live in a city with a single line’s commuter service. At hotels near DFW and IAH, I arranged quid pro quos with a couple of hotels in exchange for an extended period of shuttle service and free parking.  As locations for meetings, they were as good as the alternatives and anxious to book the business in return for a minor occasional freebie. TMO

Response:

I think it depends entirely on your circumstances, and you can’t just issue a blanket statement like "Travel Agents are always great" or "Travel Agents always suck". For those who travel for a living (like myself), a travel agent is invaluable.  We don’t have time to search for the best price and book it ourselves, and in some cases, the tickets are charged directly to our employer anyway, so we could not book our own travel even if we wanted to. Do Travel Agents save money?  For me, you bet!  In several ways: * Although there are sometimes web-based prices that are cheaper, I’ve found my TA is often quite good at finding little deals I didn’t know about, or creatively putting together bits and pieces of different tickets to get me where I want to go and when. * My TA knows about all of my preferences, so I don’t have to paw through loads of web responses to a web-based search for the one or two flights that fit my needs.  I don’t know of a web-based search engine that will let me specify that I *always* want a 2 hour layover, and I don’t like flying on RJ’s, or that I only want Hertz rental cars with Neverlost, or that I prefer Marriott-family hotels, *and* I’m a smoker, AND I have dozens if not hundreds of airline, hotel, and rental car loyalty program numbers that all need to be plugged in, and so on, and so on.  She knows it, she juggles it, I don’t have to worry about it. * My TA sometimes shoots me little deals.  I mention that my wife and I are taking a few day’s vacation, and she hooks me up with some free rental car coupons she happens to have laying around (assuming that she *does* have them laying around).  Nothing like your TA putting a couple hundred dollars back in your wallet to make you appreciate her even more. * I can shoot an e-mail to my TA and say "Clone my last trip, but this time give me a hotel closer to the employer" and that’s literally all I have to do.  She presents me with options (usually two or three, tops) and I tell her which one to book.  End of problem for me, she is the one working her tail off. * Ever try to get out of a ‘non-refundable’ ticket?  My TA has saved my bacon at least a couple of times when a customer cancelled on me and I was already comitted to an expensive ticket.  Experienced TA’s have ‘pals’ inside the industry who can sometimes do favors.  Not always, but sometimes. * My TA has on occasion called up an airline that I wanted to fly on and talked them into matching a price on a cheaper airline going the same place that I didn’t want to fly on.  I suppose I could do it, but who has the time?  And I’m not the world’s greatest negotiator. * My TA has a database of reports that customers have made about certain hotels – she has warned me off of hotels that seemed great on paper (close to the customer, good price, name-brand hotel chain), but have lousy management, so the place is not clean, or in a high-crime area (yes, really) or has junkies prowling the parking lots at night, etc (also happened to me once).  Tell me which web-based service can tell you that a certain hotel is right next to a Greyhound Bus terminal that is open until 3 a.m. or that a nearby factory belches noxious fumes at 5 in the morning and your hotel is downwind.  I’ve been saved from all those and more by my TA, who has lots of data and often knows the score. My wife and I hire a cleaning lady to come to our house once a week and do a deep clean.  Yes, we could do it ourselves and save the cost.  But in terms of time saved, it is worth the money.  I get my clothes laundered, and I always pay extra to have them fold my shirts instead of leaving them on hangers.  Is it worth it?  For me, yes.  I found it was taking me 20 minutes a week to fold my shirts before packing them for my next trip.  20 minutes > $10 USD.  I’ll spend the money and be glad for the 20 minutes of my life back. I guess what I’m trying to say is that in general, if your goal is to find the absolute best price without regard for the time you spend looking for it, you’ll probably be disappointed in the services of a TA.  Also, my TA has told me that there are some web-only fares that are NOT AVAILABLE to TA’s – it is a case of the airline trying to do independent Travel Agents in. However, if your time is worth more to you than the couple of bucks you might save scrounging on your own, then a TA is often well worth it.  A good TA is worth his or her weight in gold, and I treasure the one I’ve got now – although actually, ALL the TA’s that my company has used have been terrific over the years.  Just my experience, your milage may vary. One thing that I have to toss in – only because your post got me thinking about it, not aimed at you, so don’t take it personally! I notice from time to time in this forum that this person or that will describe how they have been cheated, crapped-on, or otherwise done in by an airline, hotel, or some other travel-related service or vendor. And of course that’s no fun.  But I have also often noticed that these are the same people who scrounge for the absolute lowest price on EVERYTHING, regardless of imputed quality, and then complain when it turns out to be crap.  I mean, if you book travel on the Grace L. Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Repair Company and stay at the Chalk Outline Hotel in Hell’s Kitchen, NY and spend less than $20, yes, you’re probably going to have a rotten time.  I know that sometimes budgets are tight, but dang – travel is voluntary.  Spend cheap, get cheap.  Name of the game. Anyway, back on topic – for me, TA’s are invaluable, worth much more than the few bucks I (or my company or customer, more likely) might have saved.  But if you’re a one-time flier who is both able and willing to search high and low for the best bucket-shop consolidator ticket possible and pay in S&H green stamps or trade for Beanie Babies or something, then no, a TA will probably not be of much value to you. Best Regards, Bill Mattocks

Response:

> There’s a curve defined by your willingness to expend effort and the > complexity of the task. It’d be the same thing dealing with a doctor. If you > cut your hand, you may choose to just deal with it at home if you have the > supplies and expertise. Or you may choose to have the peace of mind or > simplicity of having someone else take care of it. That’s like a simple > point-to-point, basically domestic (Mexico etc.), round-trip.

Pretty good analysis, though a flawed analogy, especially the one below: > On the other hand, if you need open-heart surgery (i.e., a complex > round-the-world) it’s pretty unlikely you’re doing it in the kitchen.

Even if I could do as good as job as an open-heart surgeon, I am not allowed to practice, by law, without certification, and I don’t get perks like bonus Frequent Surgery Miles for doing it myself rather than paying for the fees the Surgeon need to charge for making a living. The travel agent, IMHO, is a dying breed like the horse and buggy, in today’s world of increasing computer literacy and ever- improving FREE service (as well as the service paying YOU to use it) of internet web sites. But I agree that there will always be a few that perfer the use of travel agents (for whatever reason), as there are the Amish and other folks who prefer the use of horse and buggy over the use of automobiles and airplanes. — Bob. P.S.  I know more about certain airlines some complicated travels to certain locations betterthan most travel agents.  :-)

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hello, > Last week I was looking at plane tickets from Austin, Texas to Mexico > City for the first week of August. I had been checking prices on the > Internet (Orbitz & Expedia) and I thought I would be smart and call > some of the travel agents listed in the Sunday travel section of the > paper to see if they could beat the $330 price I found on several > Internet sites. > I asked four travel agents for a quote for the same dates and to pick > the cheapest airline. Here were my results: > (1) $346 (2) $516 (3) $366 (4) $385 > These were supposedly consolidator travel agents–two of them > specifically mentioned Latin American expertise–and none of them > could beat the price I could easily find on the Internet. Are travel > agents worth anything for these kind of trips? > Continental ended up dropping their price to $297 and I bought it on > their web page with no commission and 1,000 bonus miles.

Let’s say you decide to cancel your trip the next day. Many agents could cancel it and get your money back Try that with one you bought directly from CO. TAs are also useful for things other than getting fare quotes. (I had one wax my car once)

Response:

Hello, Last week I was looking at plane tickets from Austin, Texas to Mexico City for the first week of August. I had been checking prices on the Internet (Orbitz & Expedia) and I thought I would be smart and call some of the travel agents listed in the Sunday travel section of the paper to see if they could beat the $330 price I found on several Internet sites. I asked four travel agents for a quote for the same dates and to pick the cheapest airline. Here were my results: (1) $346 (2) $516 (3) $366 (4) $385 These were supposedly consolidator travel agents–two of them specifically mentioned Latin American expertise–and none of them could beat the price I could easily find on the Internet. Are travel agents worth anything for these kind of trips? Continental ended up dropping their price to $297 and I bought it on their web page with no commission and 1,000 bonus miles. Cheers, Ben

Response:

> These were supposedly consolidator travel agents–two of them > specifically mentioned Latin American expertise–and none of them > could beat the price I could easily find on the Internet. Are travel > agents worth anything for these kind of trips?

There’s a curve defined by your willingness to expend effort and the complexity of the task. It’d be the same thing dealing with a doctor. If you cut your hand, you may choose to just deal with it at home if you have the supplies and expertise. Or you may choose to have the peace of mind or simplicity of having someone else take care of it. That’s like a simple point-to-point, basically domestic (Mexico etc.), round-trip. On the other hand, if you need open-heart surgery (i.e., a complex round-the-world) it’s pretty unlikely you’re doing it in the kitchen. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu Latest photos: Maldives, Dubai and Vietnam

Response:

Question:

> "It’s no secret that we want our loyal customers to stick with us," > says United spokesman Jason Schechter. "Programs that award our > frequent fliers help drive traffic." > The data also could help United identify why it might be losing good > customers to competitors, says Blair Pomeroy, global director of > airline strategy for Accenture, a consulting firm.

I wasn’t one of United’s bigger "loyal customers" — only made Premier maybe 2 or 3 out of the 15+ years during which I made strenuous efforts to steer all of my air travel to United. But both of the times this past year when I attempted to cash in miles for flights, I encountered so many restrictions — such limited availability of mileage-redeemable seats, such a hassle in finding them, even with a full week’s leeway in my departure and return dates in one case — that I decided it was no longer worth it: why accumulate United miles if it’s going to be a near-hopeless battle to use them? I’ve been flying either the cheapest or the most convenient flights I encounter on the web since then — and have pretty much had good experiences doing so.   If United would set some clear policies guaranteeing reasonable space availability for their Mileage Plus redemptions, and then _deliver_ on their promises, I go back to my old habits.  Otherwise, no. — "Power tends to corrupt.  Absolute power corrupts absolutely."   Lord Acton (1834-1902) "Dependence on advertising tends to corrupt.  Total dependence on advertising  corrupts totally." (today’s equivalent)  

Response:

exactly my experience…fuck UA….flight times, fares, convienience now rule, not loyality…..it is nearly impossible to use their wothless miles.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "It’s no secret that we want our loyal customers to stick with us," > says United spokesman Jason Schechter. "Programs that award our > frequent fliers help drive traffic." > The data also could help United identify why it might be losing good > customers to competitors, says Blair Pomeroy, global director of > airline strategy for Accenture, a consulting firm. > I wasn’t one of United’s bigger "loyal customers" — only made Premier > maybe 2 or 3 out of the 15+ years during which I made strenuous efforts > to steer all of my air travel to United. > But both of the times this past year when I attempted to cash in miles > for flights, I encountered so many restrictions — such limited > availability of mileage-redeemable seats, such a hassle in finding them, > even with a full week’s leeway in my departure and return dates in one > case — that I decided it was no longer worth it: why accumulate United > miles if it’s going to be a near-hopeless battle to use them? > I’ve been flying either the cheapest or the most convenient flights I > encounter on the web since then — and have pretty much had good > experiences doing so. > If United would set some clear policies guaranteeing reasonable space > availability for their Mileage Plus redemptions, and then _deliver_ on > their promises, I go back to my old habits.  Otherwise, no. > — > "Power tends to corrupt.  Absolute power corrupts absolutely." > Lord Acton (1834-1902) > "Dependence on advertising tends to corrupt.  Total dependence on > advertising  corrupts totally." (today’s equivalent)

Response:

06/02/2003 – Updated 06:23 AM ET   United gives elite fliers miles for sharing rival info By Barbara De Lollis, USA TODAY Reeling from a slump in high-fare business travel, United Airlines is quietly trying to learn if its most frequent fliers are switching to competitors. United recently mailed offers to some elite-level Mileage Plus members inviting them to fax their mileage statements from up to three other airlines. Their reward: 3,000 bonus miles for each statement to help them requalify for another year in the perk-loaded top levels of Mileage Plus. The offer is getting notice from some United fliers because usually only paid flying miles count toward Mileage Plus Premier, Premier Executive or Premier Executive 1K membership. Fliers need at least 25,000 miles in a year to reach Premier and 100,000 to attain 1K status. Frequent fliers covet elite status for the generous bonus miles for travel awards, complimentary upgrades and priority services. Many frequent fliers are elites in two or more programs. 1K member Russ Sharer didn’t hesitate to fax his statements. "3,000 miles are not a big deal; 9,000 are. I’m willing to jump through some hoops to stay a 1K," says Sharer, a Santa Barbara, Calif., marketing executive. Sharer plans to maintain his 1K status for a sixth year, even though American is also courting his business. American, he says, is quietly offering United 1K fliers access to the elite level of its frequent-flier program to get more of their business. Other United fliers say they might not share their statements, citing concerns about privacy or the possibility of being "flagged" a disloyal customer. United’s "Great Offer" also promises elite fliers additional bonus miles if they make more United flights, at higher classes of fares, from mid-May through mid-August than they did in the first quarter. The promotion could raise badly needed revenue as United reorganizes under bankruptcy court protection amid weak demand and intense competition from low-fare airlines. "It’s no secret that we want our loyal customers to stick with us," says United spokesman Jason Schechter. "Programs that award our frequent fliers help drive traffic." By analyzing fliers’ travel patterns on other carriers, United could try to lure back customers who show the greatest revenue potential, says Thom Nulty, a former airline executive. "They’re thinking, ‘Maybe we can get $30,000 a year more from this guy.’ " The data also could help United identify why it might be losing good customers to competitors, says Blair Pomeroy, global director of airline strategy for Accenture, a consulting firm. "That might lead to some marketing changes or flag further analysis into whether it’s a service issue, schedule issue or maybe a terminal or lounge issue," Pomeroy says.

Response:

Question:

At Heathrow Airport today, an individual, later discovered to be a public school teacher, was arrested trying to board a flight while in possession of a compass, a protractor, and a graphing calculator. Authorities believe he is a member of the notorious al-Gebra movement. He is being charged with carrying weapons of math instruction Ken Wilson Cheese-eating-surrender monkey

Response:

> At Heathrow Airport today, an individual, later > discovered to be a public school teacher, was arrested > trying to board a flight while in possession of a > compass, a protractor, and a graphing calculator. > Authorities believe he is a member of the notorious > al-Gebra movement. He is being charged with carrying > weapons of math instruction

Excellent!

Response:

> At Heathrow Airport today, an individual, later > discovered to be a public school teacher, was arrested > trying to board a flight while in possession of a > compass, a protractor, and a graphing calculator. > Authorities believe he is a member of the notorious > al-Gebra movement. He is being charged with carrying > weapons of math instruction > Ken Wilson > Cheese-eating-surrender monkey

Response:

>>At Heathrow Airport today, an individual, later >discovered to be a public school teacher, was arrested >trying to board a flight while in possession of a >compass, a protractor, and a graphing calculator. >Authorities believe he is a member of the notorious >al-Gebra movement. He is being charged with carrying >weapons of math instruction

Recently I flew for the first time in two years (I’ve been avoiding the Dept. of Homeland Absurdity waiting in lines routine).  As I was about to go through the main people scanner, I saw a picture of a pocketknife with a circle and slash.  Crap! The pen knife I carry (1" blade) is now illegal to carry onto an airplane.  Absurd (see above), as it would be more likely to fold up and hurt the wielder than anything else. I briefly considered protesting that it was my defense against terrorists, but just went ahead and ran it back to the counter. Meanwhile, they happily passed me through with my mechanical pencil.  It’s the kind with a tapered steel barrel, and a needle sort of thing on the end to protect the skinny lead.  A *much* more dangerous object to have in a terrorists’ hands! Fortunately for all, I’m not a terrorist.  But it reminded me of why I’ve been avoiding airports the last year and a half…

Response:

Didn’t the Israeli secret service laugh at some of the post 911 safety measures being imposed to safeguard air travel, stating that a properly honed edge of a credit card could slice a person’s throat severely enough for the victim to bleed to death? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>At Heathrow Airport today, an individual, later >>discovered to be a public school teacher, was arrested >>trying to board a flight while in possession of a >>compass, a protractor, and a graphing calculator. >>Authorities believe he is a member of the notorious >>al-Gebra movement. He is being charged with carrying >>weapons of math instruction >Recently I flew for the first time in two years >(I’ve been avoiding the Dept. of Homeland Absurdity >waiting in lines routine).  As I was about to go >through the main people scanner, I saw a picture >of a pocketknife with a circle and slash.  Crap! >The pen knife I carry (1" blade) is now illegal >to carry onto an airplane.  Absurd (see above), >as it would be more likely to fold up and hurt the >wielder than anything else. >I briefly considered protesting that it was my >defense against terrorists, but just went ahead >and ran it back to the counter. >Meanwhile, they happily passed me through with my >mechanical pencil.  It’s the kind with a tapered >steel barrel, and a needle sort of thing on the end >to protect the skinny lead.  A *much* more dangerous >object to have in a terrorists’ hands! >Fortunately for all, I’m not a terrorist.  But it >reminded me of why I’ve been avoiding airports the >last year and a half…

Response:

The government is so retarded that it hires other retards to squash the good ideas of normal and intelligent people. I had the solution figured to airplane terrorism out two days after 9/11, the cheapest most effective way to keep planes from ever being used that way again (assuming that the screening for pilots with agendas and mental problems is adequate, of course). This would add maybe 200-300 pounds to the weight and $2000-$3000 to the cost of each plane. Although Captian Picard does have to take some of the credit… All you need is some cheap webcams for the pilots to be able to monitor the passenger cabin, a few radio panic buttons for the flight attendants, and some vacuum lines. You would be appalled at how fast two heavy duty jet aircraft engines could suck the air pressure out of the pasenger cabin, just run the vacuum lines to the air intakes of each engine and have a set of redundant failsafe valves.  If this doesn’t impress you, take off the air cleaner off your puny 4 cylinder car engine, and make the mistake of placing your hand over the carburetor air inlet sometime… you’ll be sorry, because it will hurt. Just remember the volume of air that goes out the exhaust of a jet engine must be sufficient to move the entire plane forward at an impressive weight of speed, and that’s a lot of air.  The same amount of air that comes out the exhaust comes in the air intake, it just moves out the exhaust a lot faster than it comes in the intake. The consideration here is that you don’t want the engines to suck *all the air out of the cabin, just 70 or 80 or 90 percent, enough to knock everyone out from oxygen deprivation.  So there have to be redundant air pressure monitoring systems for the cockpit so the pilots can manually override it if something fucks up and too much air pressure gets sucked out. You could just release the pressure above 10,000 feet, but that leaves the problem of what might happen whenever the plane is below 10,000 feet.  This method works at any altitude, even while the plane is still on the ground, as long as the engines are running. Picard: "Computer, flood all decks with anesthesine gas except this one" Why I would waste my time running this past some government retard, I couldn’t begin to know, its like trying to teach rocket science to a chimpanzee… maybe one of you can try…

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Didn’t the Israeli secret service laugh at some of the post 911 safety > measures being imposed to safeguard air travel, stating that a > properly honed edge of a credit card could slice a person’s throat > severely enough for the victim to bleed to death?

Response:

It should be obvious that the pilot has to manually hit some buttons or switches to activate the system, and that would automatically prevent the oxygen masks from dropping down in the passenger cabin… Any emergency O2 tanks in the passenger cabin have to be relocated in the cockpit area instead of where they had been stored, those sort of minor details…. not easy to sneak an oxygen tank past the security that existed pre-9/11.

Response:

Kudos on a very thought provoking solution. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >The government is so retarded that it hires other retards to squash the good >ideas of normal and intelligent people. >I had the solution figured to airplane terrorism out two days after 9/11, >the cheapest most effective way to keep planes from ever being used that way >again (assuming that the screening for pilots with agendas and mental >problems is adequate, of course). >This would add maybe 200-300 pounds to the weight and $2000-$3000 to the >cost of each plane. >Although Captian Picard does have to take some of the credit… >All you need is some cheap webcams for the pilots to be able to monitor the >passenger cabin, a few radio panic buttons for the flight attendants, and >some vacuum lines. >You would be appalled at how fast two heavy duty jet aircraft engines could >suck the air pressure out of the pasenger cabin, just run the vacuum lines >to the air intakes of each engine and have a set of redundant failsafe >valves.  If this doesn’t impress you, take off the air cleaner off your puny >4 cylinder car engine, and make the mistake of placing your hand over the >carburetor air inlet sometime… you’ll be sorry, because it will hurt. >Just remember the volume of air that goes out the exhaust of a jet engine >must be sufficient to move the entire plane forward at an impressive weight >of speed, and that’s a lot of air.  The same amount of air that comes out >the exhaust comes in the air intake, it just moves out the exhaust a lot >faster than it comes in the intake. >The consideration here is that you don’t want the engines to suck *all the >air out of the cabin, just 70 or 80 or 90 percent, enough to knock everyone >out from oxygen deprivation.  So there have to be redundant air pressure >monitoring systems for the cockpit so the pilots can manually override it if >something fucks up and too much air pressure gets sucked out. >You could just release the pressure above 10,000 feet, but that leaves the >problem of what might happen whenever the plane is below 10,000 feet.  This >method works at any altitude, even while the plane is still on the ground, >as long as the engines are running. >Picard: "Computer, flood all decks with anesthesine gas except this one" >Why I would waste my time running this past some government retard, I >couldn’t begin to know, its like trying to teach rocket science to a >chimpanzee… maybe one of you can try… > Didn’t the Israeli secret service laugh at some of the post 911 safety > measures being imposed to safeguard air travel, stating that a > properly honed edge of a credit card could slice a person’s throat > severely enough for the victim to bleed to death?

Response:

Two QANTAS stewards were stabbed yesterday on a domestic flight from Melbourne to Tasmainia by some maniac weilding a sharpened piece of wood. I believe the QANTAS stewards have undergone some form of self defence training since 911. Apparently pasengers also intervened and helped the stewards contain the idiot. Warren

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Didn’t the Israeli secret service laugh at some of the post 911 safety > measures being imposed to safeguard air travel, stating that a > properly honed edge of a credit card could slice a person’s throat > severely enough for the victim to bleed to death? >>>At Heathrow Airport today, an individual, later >>>discovered to be a public school teacher, was arrested >>>trying to board a flight while in possession of a >>>compass, a protractor, and a graphing calculator. >>>Authorities believe he is a member of the notorious >>>al-Gebra movement. He is being charged with carrying >>>weapons of math instruction >Recently I flew for the first time in two years >(I’ve been avoiding the Dept. of Homeland Absurdity >waiting in lines routine).  As I was about to go >through the main people scanner, I saw a picture >of a pocketknife with a circle and slash.  Crap! >The pen knife I carry (1" blade) is now illegal >to carry onto an airplane.  Absurd (see above), >as it would be more likely to fold up and hurt the >wielder than anything else. >I briefly considered protesting that it was my >defense against terrorists, but just went ahead >and ran it back to the counter. >Meanwhile, they happily passed me through with my >mechanical pencil.  It’s the kind with a tapered >steel barrel, and a needle sort of thing on the end >to protect the skinny lead.  A *much* more dangerous >object to have in a terrorists’ hands! >Fortunately for all, I’m not a terrorist.  But it >reminded me of why I’ve been avoiding airports the >last year and a half…

Response:

> Didn’t the Israeli secret service laugh at some of the post 911 safety > measures being imposed to safeguard air travel, stating that a > properly honed edge of a credit card could slice a person’s throat > severely enough for the victim to bleed to death?

For that matter, if the terrorists are trained well enough in martial arts they wouldn’t need *any* weapons to seriously injure, incapacitate, or kill the average person. Punch or chop someone in the adams apple with 60lbs of force, (not hard to do), their larnyx and windpipe will be crushed and they will suffocate and die, no matter how big they are.  Something my Kempo teacher taught me when I was 12 years old, like my first or second day of classes.  Lovely thing to tell a 12 year old, huh ? It takes a lot of time, patience, and dedication to get really good, but Al Quaeda is known for it’s patience. OTOH, maybe if they stuck with it long enough, they’d find a little inner peace and harmony and change their minds about the whole terrorism thing.. …nah.

Response:

Question:

download and set-up a Deal Detector at Orbitz www.orbitz.com/dealdetector. Be sure to watch for a price drop after you buy your ticket as well Bob The Internet Travel Guru www.InternetTravelTips.com

Hi I will have to soon make 2 trips locally in the USA.  One is to visit family and friends on the West coast and the second to attend a seminar.  Where can I find good deals on air travel? Some web sites seem to ask you to quote a price.  How do you play this game?  I don’t know what is the right price to these destinations. Free would be nice. $10 would be nice too but not realistic.  How do I find good deals for air travel? Thank you in advance for any help. Subba Rao

Response:

Alternatively, use one of the cheaper airlines listed in www.lowcostairlines.org (check the fares on their websites)

Response:

> Some web sites seem to ask you to quote a price.  How do you play > this game?  I don’t know what is the right price to these destinations. > Free would be nice. $10 would be nice too but not realistic.  How do > I find good deals for air travel?

 www.priceline.com  lets you offer up a bid–though  they won’t let you start ridiculously low and then keep upping it by a little–there are restrictions on how often you can try bidding–and the flights you get could be any time of day on the days you choose.  This site:  http://pub180.ezboard.com/bpricelineandexpediabidding.html? keeps a compendium of successful bids from various cities. www.hotwire.com also gives you some cheap flight options, and will also NOT let you know what time of day you are travelling (or the airline), but does tell you the fare in advance.

Response:

  This site: >  http://pub180.ezboard.com/bpricelineandexpediabidding.html? > keeps a compendium of successful bids from various cities.

Ahem…"some" successful bids.  The "keeper" of that board is *notorious* for censoring low bids…or even bids that that are not placed through the links on her site. *Not* recommended. — Best Greg

Response:

Hi I will have to soon make 2 trips locally in the USA.  One is to visit family and friends on the West coast and the second to attend a seminar.  Where can I find good deals on air travel? Some web sites seem to ask you to quote a price.  How do you play this game?  I don’t know what is the right price to these destinations. Free would be nice. $10 would be nice too but not realistic.  How do I find good deals for air travel? Thank you in advance for any help. Subba Rao

Response:

Travelocity, Orbitz, cheaptickets, etc. Put in a fare watch, and they’ll notify you if fare drops by a certain percentage.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi > I will have to soon make 2 trips locally in the USA.  One is to > visit family and friends on the West coast and the second to attend > a seminar.  Where can I find good deals on air travel? > Some web sites seem to ask you to quote a price.  How do you play > this game?  I don’t know what is the right price to these destinations. > Free would be nice. $10 would be nice too but not realistic.  How do > I find good deals for air travel? > Thank you in advance for any help. > Subba Rao

Response:

Question:

Hello, I live in the Washington, DC area and I am wondering if it is worth the investment to join the International Association of Air Transport Couriers (IAATC) or the American Courier Association (ACA).  I know the general story behind being an air courier, and from what I’ve read on various websites including those of IAATC and ACA, it seems like there’s a far better selection from New York and some larger west coast cities like San Fransisco, Seattle and Los Angeles.  Are there any bargains and/or selection of cities to be found from the Washington, DC area? Are the prices you get for flights out of there worth it given the investment you make for joining ACA or IAATC? Or is being an air courier really just a NYC and/or west coast thing? Thanks in advance for your help.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hello, >I live in the Washington, DC area and I am wondering if it is worth >the investment to join the International Association of Air Transport >Couriers (IAATC) or the American Courier Association (ACA).  I know >the general story behind being an air courier, and from what I’ve read >on various websites including those of IAATC and ACA, it seems like >there’s a far better selection from New York and some larger west >coast cities like San Fransisco, Seattle and Los Angeles.  Are there >any bargains and/or selection of cities to be found from the >Washington, DC area? Are the prices you get for flights out of there >worth it given the investment you make for joining ACA or IAATC? Or is >being an air courier really just a NYC and/or west coast thing? >Thanks in advance for your help.

In my experience you shouldn’t have to pay to join an organization ever – rip-off. But I think if you check prices, general air travel is as cheap and often cheaper than courier travel. The good ‘ol days are gone I’m afraid. Pete

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hello, >I live in the Washington, DC area and I am wondering if it is worth >the investment to join the International Association of Air Transport >Couriers (IAATC) or the American Courier Association (ACA).  I know >the general story behind being an air courier, and from what I’ve read >on various websites including those of IAATC and ACA, it seems like >there’s a far better selection from New York and some larger west >coast cities like San Fransisco, Seattle and Los Angeles.  Are there >any bargains and/or selection of cities to be found from the >Washington, DC area? Are the prices you get for flights out of there >worth it given the investment you make for joining ACA or IAATC? Or is >being an air courier really just a NYC and/or west coast thing? >Thanks in advance for your help. > In my experience you shouldn’t have to pay to join an organization ever – > rip-off. But I think if you check prices, general air travel is as cheap and > often cheaper than courier travel. The good ‘ol days are gone I’m afraid. > Pete

I agree, you probably don’t have to join a courier organization. I flew as a courier about 8 years ago, and I wasn’t a member of any group. It was kind of a pain, though, because you can’t change your plans, as you don’t own the ticket, the agency does. Actually, you ‘can’ change your plans, but you have to pay . . . So being a courier isn’t so different than traveling on a very cheap ticket. The good thing was that I paid $250 for a $500 ticket. But I doubt if I’d ever do it again. Ticket prices are much lower now than they were 8 years ago. And you do realize, don’t you, that the reason the couriers want you is so they can have your baggage space, right? That’s do-able, but you are limited to carry-on baggage. OK for going. Not so great for returning if you get any souvenirs. Ned

Response:

Question:

Posters…..please note that my earlier "first" reply was to the poster named "amp-spamfree" and NOT Mr. Travel.  My brain and my eyes got their messages a bit mixed up this morning.  My apologizes to Mr Travel.  The remarks were for "amp-spamfree".  Thanks. Mary

Response:

>The airlines are not part of this, mary – its a > TSA "thing". And if you are not comfortable > that the TSA provides added value, take > Greyhound.

YOU take the Greyhound!  TSA/Airlines…sorry Charlie….it all means the same thing to most intelligent folks.  And "no" I am not comfortable or convinced that all this crap going on at the airports is providing added value or security.  It’s more like a sick game of "let’s pretend we are protecting you while we keep you so agitated you won’t realize, we CAN’T!"    I, also,  don’t think so called intelligent people should call others "stupid" because they don’t appreciate vandalism of their luggage. There is no way you can convince me that the TSA signs "really" indicate this kind of abuse to luggage as was done to the poster’s mother.  As for myself,  I will not leave things to chance. I will still call the airlines I am traveling on soon and get the exact info for myself and keep "names" as a reference for any letters I want to send to the TSA if I am given misleading or incorrect info.  They can check my luggage all they want and me with it but they "can’t" stupidly destroy my luggage.   And I don’t travel with "dirty" underwear so they will have to be content with being thrilled by "yours"! <g   Good Morning Mr. Mary

Response:

> none of the ones that i know personally could be described that > way.  most of them quit fairly good jobs to take the TSA job. > AFAIK none of the TSA baggage inspectors at JNU used to do the > same for AS (and at small airports, the screeners used to be > airline employees).

TSA recently admitted that some 30% of their workforce is former Argenbright, et al.  Since they are much, much, larger than Argenbright was in terms of number of employees, it seems that they just hired the entire lot wholesale, except those who could not pass drug tests, background tests, or were not citizens. Yes, ALL of the former airport security guards who could pass these criteria are now working at the TSA, assuming that they wanted to. Your tax dollars at work, and let’s please quit pretending that these aren’t the exact same morons in different livery.  They are the same people. Best Regards, Bill Mattocks

Response:

> Stupid people shouldn’t be compensated for being stupid.

One of the biggest threats to a free America is Homeland Security. > The airlines are not part of this, mary – its a TSA "thing".  And if > you are not comfortable that the TSA provides added value, take > Greyhound.

No, if we don’t like it, we can fight to change it. > I really don’t care if they want to look at my dirty underwear – and I > am more confident that Abdul’s ticking radio will not go unnoticed.

How many luggage bombs have brought down a US aircraft in the last 10 years? How many truck bombs have terroris used successfully in the US in the same period? Maybe we should be inspecting all trucks that drive by buildings at a higher rate than we check airline passengers. If we to prevent travel deaths, maybe private automobiles should be banned. > If you lock your suitcase and they want in, what you get is a damaged > suitcase. You are warned in no uncertain terms what the consequences > will be.  DAMAGED SUITCASE.  What more do you want to know?  Do you > want a list of things that LOOK like bombs?  Here’s one – peanut > butter.

Valid point… A list of things that look like bombs… Perhaps we should force people to dribk all liquids brought onboard planes. Why stop at commercial aircraft? What prevents someone from dropping small bombs from a non commercial aircraft over Dodger stadium?  Maybe all planes should be restricted from takeoff unless everyone on board has been through security.   Sure, we could ban things and inspect more, but what kind of life is that?  We have given up too much already.  We didn’t need to triple the number of people at security and pay them triple the salary of the old people that were there. Despite all of the complaints about prior lax security, 9-11 had NOTHING to do with the people at security screening or at the gate. I have seen no valid report of a hijacker carrying any banned weapon on those flights. If you want to trade security for freedom, that’s your choice. Not mine….

Response:

> She was NOT warned to not lock the bag.  She was warned that if she kept the > locks on the bag, then they might be cut off. > Now go crawl back under your rock.

and they were.  if the lock hasps were too hard for the TSA’s boltcutters to cut, of course they cut the softer pulls. btw, any good luggage repair shop or tailoring place that repairs zippers should be able to get new pulls, at least for most current japanese made zippers.

Response:

I’m from the gummint and I’m here to HELP you…

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->These are the people protecting us from > disaster. >Ryan > Not really.  These are the people our government is trying to program us > to "think" are protecting us from disaster.  My goodness, they even made > them federal employees.  If that can’t protect us…..what can?? > Mary

Response:

> >no, her mistake was to lock the bags. she had > been warned. > I totally disagree with you on this.  If they told her they were going > to "cut the locks off" that is totally different from what they actually > did from what was posted.  Cutting the locks off and destroying the > suitcase for any future locking are two different things.  

You haven’t flown since the 1st of the year, have you.  READ the sign that the TSA has put up atr the checkin counters and at the scanners. DAMAGED LUGGAGE is the consequence for locking your bag IF they want to peek inside. > I would like > to see what would have happened if they tried that on our rubber chicken > wielding guy, Bill Mattocks!!   > I think that lady should force Delta to replace her suitcase due to the > fact they lied to her about what would happen if the facts are as > presented here.  They should not be allowed to get away with this > action.

Stupid people shouldn’t be compensated for being stupid. > Thanks to this post, you can be sure I will call the airlines I am > flying and ask them "exactly" what they intend on doing if we put locks > on our luggage.  What you are forgetting here is that this is not > supposed to be mandatory so we have a right to know "exactly" what the > outcome will be if we lock our suitcases, IMO.  Or is that "another" > right we have suddenly lost without knowing it?   I may decide to write > to the TSA board and have them put it in writing what can and cannot be > done to our luggage under these circumstances.  We have a right to know! > Mary

The airlines are not part of this, mary – its a TSA "thing".  And if you are not comfortable that the TSA provides added value, take Greyhound. I really don’t care if they want to look at my dirty underwear – and I am more confident that Abdul’s ticking radio will not go unnoticed. If you lock your suitcase and they want in, what you get is a damaged suitcase. You are warned in no uncertain terms what the consequences will be.  DAMAGED SUITCASE.  What more do you want to know?  Do you want a list of things that LOOK like bombs?  Here’s one – peanut butter.

Response:

> She was warned they would destroy the locks, not the bag.

no, she was warned to not lock the bag.

Response:

>When my Mom flew out of Orlando the Delta rep told her that if she left her >locks on, they may be cut off.  She figured that they were cheap locks and >she would just take the risk.  Her mistake was to assume that they would cut >the lock to get it off.  Well, they didn’t.  They cut the suitcase zipper >tabs on each suitcase to remove the locks.  Now she can never lock the >bags – not even when using them for non-air travel.  Personally, I wouldn’t >have left the locks on… but she did.  However, still I don’t think that >gives them the right to destroy the bag.  Cutting the locks is very >different than cutting the suitcase. >To make matters worse, if they actually opened the bags, they certainly >didn’t look around in them.  The contents were undisturbed.

They might have dipped into them with their ‘q-tips- which pick up traces of explosive. As others have said, she shouldn’t have locked her bags.  I would imagine they simply chose the easiest way to get into the bags. Doug  –  Doug Weller member of moderation panel sci.archaeology.moderated  Doug’s Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->When my Mom flew out of Orlando the Delta rep told her that if she left her >locks on, they may be cut off.  She figured that they were cheap locks and >she would just take the risk.  Her mistake was to assume that they would cut >the lock to get it off.  Well, they didn’t.  They cut the suitcase zipper >tabs on each suitcase to remove the locks.  Now she can never lock the >bags – not even when using them for non-air travel.  Personally, I wouldn’t >have left the locks on… but she did.  However, still I don’t think that >gives them the right to destroy the bag.  Cutting the locks is very >different than cutting the suitcase. >To make matters worse, if they actually opened the bags, they certainly >didn’t look around in them.  The contents were undisturbed. > They might have dipped into them with their ‘q-tips- which pick up > traces of explosive. > As others have said, she shouldn’t have locked her bags.  I would > imagine they simply chose the easiest way to get into the bags. > Doug

I don’t know why this action by TSA agents should surprise anyone.  After all, they are for the most part the uneducated, least employable segment of society who if not for the TSA would be working at McDonald’s or some other low level job. A couple of weeks ago (at JAX) my carry-on was searched by one of these mental giants.  He was not able to get everything back into the bag and asked me if I really wanted everything back into the bag or would I like to carry the other three or four items separately. These are the people protecting us from disaster. Ryan

Response:

>These are the people protecting us from > disaster. >Ryan

Not really.  These are the people our government is trying to program us to "think" are protecting us from disaster.  My goodness, they even made them federal employees.  If that can’t protect us…..what can?? Mary

Response:

Dennis, Are you really that stupid, or just trying to be a troll? She was NOT warned to not lock the bag.  She was warned that if she kept the locks on the bag, then they might be cut off. Now go crawl back under your rock. -Rich – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> She was warned they would destroy the locks, not the bag. > no, she was warned to not lock the bag.

Response:

> I don’t know why this action by TSA agents should surprise anyone.  After > all, they are for the most part the uneducated, least employable segment of > society who if not for the TSA would be working at McDonald’s or some other > low level job.

none of the ones that i know personally could be described that way.  most of them quit fairly good jobs to take the TSA job. AFAIK none of the TSA baggage inspectors at JNU used to do the same for AS (and at small airports, the screeners used to be airline employees).

Response:

> > When my Mom flew out of Orlando the Delta rep told her that if she left her > locks on, they may be cut off.  She figured that they were cheap locks and > she would just take the risk.  Her mistake was to assume that they would cut > the lock to get it off.   > no, her mistake was to lock the bags.  she had been warned.

    She was warned they would destroy the locks, not the bag.

Response:

well, one might ASSUME that TSA isn’t QUITE that stupid, but…

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Delta told her to bring the suitcases somewhere to get a repair estimate. > She can then submit a claim.  It will take 4 to 6 months to process the > claim before she knows if they will pay for the damages or not. > The part of this that bugs me is that it leaves me wondering what the risk > of leaving locks on is – and what would they have done if she had plastic > zip locks on?  Would they still have cut the locks. > The whole unlocked luggage issue makes me not want to fly at all.  I don’t > trust the baggage handlers.  I want my luggage locked.  If something is > stolen or lost from the suitcase, who is responsible?  If they break a > zipper or something closing the suitcase back up, who is responsible?  I > think this will end up having a real negative effect on an already > struggling airline industry. > -Rich > >no, her mistake was to lock the bags. she had > > been warned. > I totally disagree with you on this.  If they told her they were going > to "cut the locks off" that is totally different from what they actually > did from what was posted.  Cutting the locks off and destroying the > suitcase for any future locking are two different things.   I would like > to see what would have happened if they tried that on our rubber chicken > wielding guy, Bill Mattocks!! > I think that lady should force Delta to replace her suitcase due to the > fact they lied to her about what would happen if the facts are as > presented here.  They should not be allowed to get away with this > action. > Thanks to this post, you can be sure I will call the airlines I am > flying and ask them "exactly" what they intend on doing if we put locks > on our luggage.  What you are forgetting here is that this is not > supposed to be mandatory so we have a right to know "exactly" what the > outcome will be if we lock our suitcases, IMO.  Or is that "another" > right we have suddenly lost without knowing it?   I may decide to write > to the TSA board and have them put it in writing what can and cannot be > done to our luggage under these circumstances.  We have a right to know! > Mary

Response:

>no, her mistake was to lock the bags. she had > been warned.

I totally disagree with you on this.  If they told her they were going to "cut the locks off" that is totally different from what they actually did from what was posted.  Cutting the locks off and destroying the suitcase for any future locking are two different things.   I would like to see what would have happened if they tried that on our rubber chicken wielding guy, Bill Mattocks!!   I think that lady should force Delta to replace her suitcase due to the fact they lied to her about what would happen if the facts are as presented here.  They should not be allowed to get away with this action. Thanks to this post, you can be sure I will call the airlines I am flying and ask them "exactly" what they intend on doing if we put locks on our luggage.  What you are forgetting here is that this is not supposed to be mandatory so we have a right to know "exactly" what the outcome will be if we lock our suitcases, IMO.  Or is that "another" right we have suddenly lost without knowing it?   I may decide to write to the TSA board and have them put it in writing what can and cannot be done to our luggage under these circumstances.  We have a right to know! Mary  

Response:

Delta told her to bring the suitcases somewhere to get a repair estimate. She can then submit a claim.  It will take 4 to 6 months to process the claim before she knows if they will pay for the damages or not. The part of this that bugs me is that it leaves me wondering what the risk of leaving locks on is – and what would they have done if she had plastic zip locks on?  Would they still have cut the locks. The whole unlocked luggage issue makes me not want to fly at all.  I don’t trust the baggage handlers.  I want my luggage locked.  If something is stolen or lost from the suitcase, who is responsible?  If they break a zipper or something closing the suitcase back up, who is responsible?  I think this will end up having a real negative effect on an already struggling airline industry. -Rich

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->no, her mistake was to lock the bags. she had > been warned. > I totally disagree with you on this.  If they told her they were going > to "cut the locks off" that is totally different from what they actually > did from what was posted.  Cutting the locks off and destroying the > suitcase for any future locking are two different things.   I would like > to see what would have happened if they tried that on our rubber chicken > wielding guy, Bill Mattocks!! > I think that lady should force Delta to replace her suitcase due to the > fact they lied to her about what would happen if the facts are as > presented here.  They should not be allowed to get away with this > action. > Thanks to this post, you can be sure I will call the airlines I am > flying and ask them "exactly" what they intend on doing if we put locks > on our luggage.  What you are forgetting here is that this is not > supposed to be mandatory so we have a right to know "exactly" what the > outcome will be if we lock our suitcases, IMO.  Or is that "another" > right we have suddenly lost without knowing it?   I may decide to write > to the TSA board and have them put it in writing what can and cannot be > done to our luggage under these circumstances.  We have a right to know! > Mary

Response:

Nobody at all is required to leave their bags unlocked, no matter where you are going from or to.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> It’s not clear to me. > If I’m arriving in the US from an international origin and I am > disembarking > and completing my journey at my first port of entry am I required to > leave > my bags unlocked or not? > Is it only those passengers starting _A_ journey be it international > or domestic within the US that are required to leave their bags > unlocked?

Response:

> It’s not clear to me. > If I’m arriving in the US from an international origin and I am > disembarking > and completing my journey at my first port of entry am I required to > leave > my bags unlocked or not? > Is it only those passengers starting _A_ journey be it international > or domestic within the US that are required to leave their bags > unlocked?

Nobody is REQUIRED to.  It is RECOMMENDED by the TSA, not required.

Response:

> It’s not clear to me. > If I’m arriving in the US from an international origin and I am > disembarking and completing my journey at my first port of entry > am I required to leave my bags unlocked or not?

When in doubt, call the airlines involved and ask.

Response:

When my Mom flew out of Orlando the Delta rep told her that if she left her locks on, they may be cut off.  She figured that they were cheap locks and she would just take the risk.  Her mistake was to assume that they would cut the lock to get it off.  Well, they didn’t.  They cut the suitcase zipper tabs on each suitcase to remove the locks.  Now she can never lock the bags – not even when using them for non-air travel.  Personally, I wouldn’t have left the locks on… but she did.  However, still I don’t think that gives them the right to destroy the bag.  Cutting the locks is very different than cutting the suitcase. To make matters worse, if they actually opened the bags, they certainly didn’t look around in them.  The contents were undisturbed. -Rich

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> and completing my journey at my first port of entry am I required to > leave my bags unlocked or not? > Feel free to lock your bags at any time. If TSA or its international > equivalent wants to rummage through your undies, they’ll break locks if > needed.

Response:

> When my Mom flew out of Orlando the Delta rep told her that if she left her > locks on, they may be cut off.  She figured that they were cheap locks and > she would just take the risk.  Her mistake was to assume that they would cut > the lock to get it off.  

no, her mistake was to lock the bags.  she had been warned.

Response:

She was warned that the LOCKS might be cut.  They didn’t warn her that they might destroy her suitcase to remove the lock.  She spoke to Delta about it and they confirmed that this is NOT supposed to happen.  They are not supposed to harm the bag in any way.  They are only authorized to destroy the lock. -Rich – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> When my Mom flew out of Orlando the Delta rep told her that if she left her > locks on, they may be cut off.  She figured that they were cheap locks and > she would just take the risk.  Her mistake was to assume that they would cut > the lock to get it off. > no, her mistake was to lock the bags.  she had been warned.

Response:

It’s not clear to me. If I’m arriving in the US from an international origin and I am disembarking and completing my journey at my first port of entry am I required to leave my bags unlocked or not? Is it only those passengers starting _A_ journey be it international or domestic within the US that are required to leave their bags unlocked?

Response:

> and completing my journey at my first port of entry am I required to > leave my bags unlocked or not?

Feel free to lock your bags at any time. If TSA or its international equivalent wants to rummage through your undies, they’ll break locks if needed.

Response: